Free Republic

Just doing the crimes Americans won’t do.

Ahhhh, the little libertarian troll is back to abuse me. LOL. what a pathetic liberal you are.

Go back to MoveOn.org liberal. Nobody here cares for your idiot comments.

Keep stalking me and I’ll do more than complain to the moderators on this site. I’ll contact the police to have them investigate you for cyber stalking and bullying. Or don’t you understand that you are breaking the law idiot?

Go away liberal. I’m done proving your a fool. Now you’re just proving me correct. Libertarians are liberals. Period.

“TLC is the absolute sewer of cable channels. Kate Plus 8 and fat chicks buying wedding dresses. Just total garbage.”

Totally agree. It’s one reason I’ve blocked it on my cable. Along with BET, MTv, VH1, MSNBC, and Bravo. If they mainly show liberal crap or reality shows like this, they are blocked. Others will be added to the list as they prove their uselessness.

I bet old Hoffa gets teabagged a lot anyway. He’s a liberal after all. They live for it.

What would they use to kill us? Pies?

Since liberals don’t like private gun ownership I doubt they would have the tools necessary to do the job nor the abilities. The game would be more factual if the Tea Party guys were shooting at them and they just had the option of running for their lives.

Bring it on libs. This is one Tea Party guy who is ready to return fire. And I’m a very good shot. Also, I’ve been shot at before and it didn’t rattle me then so I know how to fight under stress.

Just helping flush the crap out of the toilet.

Guess you’re graduating to stalker now. LOL. Tool.

My opinion is to agree with Thomas actually. But my opinion nor yours changes the facts and presidence.

Listen, I’ve done drugs in the past. Quite a varied assortment. I took my chances and know the effects and risks. I saw the harm and damage it does to people. The narcotic effects, the destruction to their lives, the cost to society in dealing with these individuals. I quit cold turkey and never went back.

Do I think the government has too much power? Yes. But legalization of drugs is the wrong direction for our country.

I answered your post when you asked that question before and you are obviously too dumb to read it. Your post #84? Sorry. I didn’t read it, and your not somone I think is important enough to go back and read. You’re a liberal dip$hit it’s obvious.

Liberals believe in legalization of drugs. So do you.
Libertarians and liberals believe in open borders. Do you?
Libertarians and liberals believe in abortion on demand. Do you?
Libertarians and liberals believe in gay marrage. Do you?

You are a libertarian, and not a conservative. It’s obvious by your posts. Libertarians are liberals who have gone so far left they are now anarchists. Anarchists are good for nobody. They are scum.

“Nice try, but a hugh and series FAIL!! The Commerce clause, in the clearly stated intent of the Founders, is intended SOLELY to ensure that the states do not set up barriers to interstate trade, such as imposing tariffs on goods coming in from another state or even just passing through, so as to prevent competition to in-state businesses. They specifically noted that FedGov was NOT to have the authority it has USURPED ever since Teddy Roosevelt, Woody Wilson and FDR. So if that’s what you’re hanging your drug warrior hat on, you’re in good Socialist company... and 1,000% WRONG!”

Guess what. I’m not as wrong as you think. Go here and see what just one (of many) legal sites says about the meaning of the Interstate Commerce clause. http://definitions.uslegal.com/i/interstate-commerce/

You can find more at other sites but I’m not going to do all the work for educating you. It’s a fools game to educate those who already think themselves above intellegence.

I’ve proven my point, yet see nothing in your posts other than your interpretation and assumptions. What you and the other libertarians here believe seems to fall short of the facts and just because you understand something different than the rest of us doesn’t mean you’re right. In some cases we agree on much, but in other cases I don’t see eye to eye with you. On the idea of legalizeing drugs I will never see a benefit to society on doing so.

Have fun voting for Ron Paul. He’ll need all of you to get his 1 percent of the vote again this election cycle.

Yeah. I guess you’re so original and have so many valid points. Yet you fail to make even one. All you seem to do is attack the poster and call them names. Yes I have done the same, but at least I provide proof of the things I find. Where is any valid point you made other than gay comments and name calling?

The only babble here is coming from you.

FWIW, I let the moderators know to keep an eye on you. You might not be on FR very much longer. Buh buy.

You can stop posting to him. He got booted from FR today. They are working on doing this to all libertarians and liberals.

I’m not afraid of freedome. But you seem to miss the idea that your rights end, where mine begin. According to numerous sites I’ve read tonight, there is a lot of history behind the narcotics laws and their constitutionality. In the fist link I provide it lays out a good history and states where the USSC gave constitutial authority in passing such laws.
Since the Constitution gives congress the rights to make such laws, the USSC listed where the laws fall under the constitution. Guess the USSC doesn’t see it the same way you do. Sorry, but your libertarian ideas are not sound according to the USSC and the constitution.

http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/physician_and_feds.html

So you understand that Portugal has decrimininalized drug possession? That is a far cry from what you guys are proposing. You need to examine the effects of the numerous drugs on society when they were largly legal back in the 1700s, 1800s and early 1900s. Then get back to me on why it would not be in the best interests of society to end the avaliability of such narcotis. I know it probably gets in the way of you enjoying a good joint. Tough. We are a nation of laws, and if you don’t like the ones we have then get enough people behind you and change them. Obviously only a small minority of you do want them legalized and not enough to overturn the federal and state laws.

More links to read to show history and cases that gave the feds the authority to do this enforcment.

http://lawbrain.com/wiki/Narcotics_Acts

http://www.naabt.org/laws.cfm

And I do hate using Wikipedia for such things, but their information was very well written. It even gives your side a little understanding.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_Substances_Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_history_of_cannabis_in_the_United_States

Maybe you libertarians should find a site that is more libertarian orented and hang out there. You’re not winning any friends here and we will refuse to surrender to your kooky ideas. This is a conservative site and not a liberal one.

Well then I guess you better tell them that they are wrong and that they have no standing under the 10th amendment. I’m sure they will listen to you.

So I take it you’re all for legalization of narcotics too?

Show us all a good example of where doing so has resulted in low crime and a utopia for the citizens.

I’m waiting as are we all.

The BATFE is just trying to cut down on the competition. Only THEY can sell to the gangs and drug lords.

Actually I believe this is typical smoke and mirrors to deflect from their getting caught in F&F.

Look for more of this to come. They have to arrest those who they made sell guns to the bad guys. That way I’m sure some will just vanish in the slime of government red tape. Some will most likely get shot resisting. The government is the current mafia.

I know one guy in Iowa that believes he’s not from America. ME!

I have a sneaky feeling he will be back with another account. They always come back and start up the same old crap.

From all the libertarians I have dealt with on FR, they have all fit the same mold. Correct me if I am wrong, but according to the Libertarian web site they believe in: Gay Marrage, abortion on demand, legalization of all drugs, open borders, pro gun (I agree with them on this one), and they support Ron Paul for president.

I know they pick and choose from the constitution like it’s some salad bar and often twist its words to make it read as they want to interpret it. Just like liberals do to the constitution and the bible.

Every libertarian I’ve dealt with has been just as foaming at the mouth in support of the same things every liberal I dealt with is.

They appear to be a little left of liberals and in my book that makes them nuts.

Jim, another couple that appears to be liberals or libertarians spouting off about legalizing drugs on another thread. They are philman_36 and dcwusmc.

The latter poster may not be a problem. The first name given has been a pain. But that’s just my observation.

From what I understand the feds can step in and deal with anything involving interstate commerce. And since drugs come across our border from other countries and cross state lines in their distribution paths it is first up to the federal government to deal with and enact laws controlling the interstate commerce of such. If the feds don’t do their jobs in this capacity then it falls to the states to deal with them as in the case of illegal immigration. Since the feds refuse to enforce the laws on immigration, then it is left to the states to deal with it as AZ has been doing.

The entire reason for the federal government is military and to control interstate commerce.