Free Republic

"Never mind", it seems that Bentham had argued against laws against sodomy, I now find.

(I am not quite sure everything is really straight about these publications ; but this may have been a "jumped gun".) / Paul

You won't tell me you really believe in God, will you ?

Just Pitching In.

Behind the flag burning can be some marxian imposters —

There certainly were some marxist-leninist criminals trying to highjack the rally today in Los Angeles.

Regardless of one's opinion on the immigration issues : posters were seen (by me) with "MAY DAY MARCH" on them (and the changing bus schedules).

So far as I recall the very notion of 'immigration' (legal or illegal) was not at all prominent on the posters ; (and I now wonder if it was there at all).

As the commies do know about planning, about deception, and about falsifying history, the rally (re immigration — but the commies have been "stealing the show") in Los Angeles today can be documented somewhere in China, or North Korea, or somewhere in the South America — today, or in 2010, etc — as "MAY DAY MARCH" (never mind the immigration and the hoaxed Mexicans etc.).

NOW IS THE TIME TO PREVENT IT !

NOW IS THE TIME NOT TO LET THE COMMIES STEAL THE SHOW !!

WPT

1) If you have an idea as to question #2 I would like to know about it.

2). The point #1, approximately :

a). Confounding 'mind' and 'brain' has been a standard item of disinformation by the psycho-marxian conspiracy (so to call the phenomenon ; I see no better term for it).

b) The work by Aleister Crowley, like it or not, has been subject of massive disinformation.
    One certainly can disapprove of some of the things A.C. had said or had done ; but this has little to do with his theoretical fundamentals (which do not necessarily imply what he and some of his followers said or did).
    A. C. fundamentals have very much to do with the individual and the freedom of the individual (and not some collectivist proposals). For that reason that author may have been exceptionally 'dangerous' to any marxist-leninist criminals and, by extension, to their dupes.
This naturally extents to his followers, T. Leary being one of them.

Even if one should entirely disapprove of either A. C. or or any of his followers, any disinformation regarding these puts one in danger nevertheless.

WPT

Ditto.

WPT

Point 1 : Why is the work by T. Leary being distorted ?

Point 2 : Why do Red-related titles disappear from the libraries ? (Possony's book in this instance).

WPT

If not related directly -- certainly there are patterns to be seen : one example follows.

Paul

http://www.geocities.com/counter_disinformation//ceplair.html

 

Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 15:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Paul Tabaka" [ . . ]
Subject: Researching the "Hollywood Ten".
To: counter-misinformation@state.gov     [ http://usinfo.state.gov/media/misinformation.html   ]

Dear Sirs,

I have seen the following title, original edition of the 1950's [i.e. 1980 (?) -- as listed].

Ceplair, Larry. Title The inquisition in Hollywood : politics in the film community, 1930-60 / Larry Ceplair and Steven Englund. Publisher Urbana, Ill. : University of Illinois Press, 2003. Description xxix, 544 p. : ill. ; 21 cm. ISBN 0252071417

The text contains a spate of Marxian propaganda falsehoods, practically libelous of the U.S. and its institutions.

That text has apparently been reissued. On the other hand, I have tried to see some texts by an author who clearly had disagreed with this society's having been taken over by a gang of ruffians sent (or directed) from the then Bolshevik USSR [cf. below].

I do not suppose that the House Committees or other anti-Communists were infallible, perhaps far from it.

It may be worthy of noticing that any party who would have disagreed with the existing order in the USSR of those times would almost certainly be shot over there.

Yet the lying whining about "blaklisting" in the US is being republished while the more likely true materials are not ; and are missing in the libraries.

" The Communists, of course, have a penchant for rewriting history after the fact. "
W.R. Kintner with J.Z. Kornfeder, The New Frontier of War
Chicago : Henry Regnery, 1962, page 181.

It looks like the Red spectre is still haunting. Please consider this.

Regards,
W. Paul Tabaka
Los Angeles, California

Today : MISSING IN THE LOS ANGELES LIBRARY (presumably stolen)
Fagan, Myron C. (Myron Coureval), b. 1887. Title Documentations of the Reds and fellow-travellers in Hollywood and TV / by Myron C. Fagan. Publisher Hollywood, Calif. : Cinema Educational Guild, 1961. Description 96 p. : ill. ; 29 cm. Language English

MISSING IN THE LOS ANGELES PUBLIC LIBRARY (presumably stolen)
Title(s) "Fellow citizens, our husbands are in prison!" / Committee to Free the Hollywood Ten. On the eve of prison / Gale Sondergaard and Albert Maltz. For justice and peace / by the Wives of the Hollywood Ten. In the Supreme Court of the United States. The time of the toad / by Dalton Trumbo. Red-verends in the communist "peace" offensive. The case of the Hollywood Ten. Red Treason in Hollywood / by Myron C. Fagan. Publisher Hollywood, Calif. : The Committee, [1950?] Paging 10 v. in 1 : ill., ports. ; 20-28 cm.

[ END LETTER ]

"But the Bush administration apparently had a change of heart following Chen's decision last month to drop an advisory council on eventual unification with the mainland despite US opposition."

This 'unification' business has been ruining China ever since the agents of the Kremlin appeared (that is about 1919-20) in that country.

The proposed (by some Americans) 'unification' of the Red forces with the Chiang Kai-shek-led Nationalist forces in the 1940's resulted in the encroachment by the Reds over the mainland which remains a problem till this very day. (As evidenced by this article).

Louis Budenz had observed something to this effect : the coalition government was a device used by the Communists to slaughter everbody with whom they had entered into the coalition.

That tactic had been used in each and every country of the East and Central Europe 1940-50's ; just as well as in China with the effect of there still having been a problem (as evidenced by the article).

There may be nothing wrong with the unification of China ; as soon as the mainland abandons the murderous marxist-leninist-maoist 'ideology'.

But this does not seem imminent. It may be wise to try not to exacerbate any matters ; however, to consider a 'unification' before there is some convincing liberalization in the mainland Chine is to consider the matters in the wrong order.

The hydra of marxism-leninism had not yet disappeared world-wide. It is anybody's guess where the Reds may be located in terms or their communication centres.

So long as there are any marxist-leninist organizations present anywhere in the world one can hardly be convinced of the liberalization in the mainland China. (The Bolshevik racket was expressly international in character).

Hence, let me repeat, to consider 'unification' in this case would be highly premature and it would be wrong order of consideration.

Whereof one should not speak of, thereon one should remain silent (based in one European author).

W. Paul Tabaka