Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $33,677
41%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 41%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: drunkendesigner

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Recognition Denied Great Scientist Who Did Not Bow to Darwin

    12/25/2005 1:43:14 PM PST · by found_one · 2 replies · 377+ views
    Creation Magazine ^ | Sept 2004 | Carl Wiland
    Creation Archive > Volume 26 Issue 4 > The not-so-Nobel decision The not-so-Nobel decision Recognition denied for achievement of great scientist—who is also a creationist by Carl Wieland Anticreationists often try to pretend that there is no prejudice against biblical creation in ‘the world of science’. But creationists have long known that things are not like that in the real world. We even have to publish our own peer-reviewed journals; any paper which does not bow to materialistic axioms on origins has a snowball’s chance in a blast furnace of getting published in a secular journal. In fact, some editors...
  • Is Intelligent Design Theory Scientific?

    12/25/2005 1:41:41 PM PST · by RussP · 401 replies · 4,893+ views
    http://RussP.us/IDscience.htm ^ | 2005-12-20 | Russ Paielli
    This most elegant system of the sun, planets, and comets could not have arisen without the design and dominion of an intelligent and powerful being. --Sir Isaac Newton, The Principia Is Intelligent Design Theory Scientific? 2005-12-20 -- If you've participated in online debates about the theory of evolution, you know the standard arguments of evolutionists. Their "trump card" is the claim that Intelligent Design (ID) theory is simply outside the realm of science. This claim is not that ID has insufficient empirical corroboration, although they often make that claim too. This claim is that ID is not even a valid...
  • Judging Darwin and God (e-mail title: Education or Indoctrination?)

    12/23/2005 12:57:35 PM PST · by Zionist Conspirator · 123 replies · 2,572+ views
    Seattle Times ^ | 12/23/'05 | David Klinghoffer
    Issuing theological statements isn't normally thought of as the job of a federal judge. Yet, this week when U.S. District Court Judge John E. Jones III released the first federal ruling on intelligent design, there was at the core of his written decision an unambiguously theological ruling: that evolution as formulated by Charles Darwin presents no conflict with the God of the Bible. Quite apart from what one thinks of his legal decision, what should we make of his theology? In brief, Jones ruled that disparaging Darwinian evolutionary theory in biology class violates the separation of church and state. The...
  • God, Darwinism, Intelligent Design and Secular Humanists. (VANITY)

    12/23/2005 1:35:25 PM PST · by 2banana · 9 replies · 400+ views
    2banana's mind | December 23, 2005 | 2banana
    God, Darwinism, Intelligent Design and Secular Humanists. My humble opinion: The Theory of Evolution is just that - A Theory. The Theory of Intelligent Design is just that - A Theory. Both theories have some facts that support them - and other facts that don't support them. It used to be that places of higher learning taught students to think for themselves based on scientific facts and evidence. But what "facts" support intelligent design? 1. Evolution doesn't explain anything on how it all began. As a theory, it is grossly incomplete. At least intelligent design has a theory on the...