Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $25,472
31%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 31%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: ourrobedmasters

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • It wasn't his child, but court says he must pay

    01/09/2006 12:19:01 AM PST · by RWR8189 · 439 replies · 8,550+ views
    Miami Herald ^ | January 5, 2006 | Sara Olkon
    A former Broward County man has been ordered to continue to pay child support for a child he did not father. He said his wife cheated on him; she denies it.Richard Parker said he never suspected that his wife had been cheating on him when she got pregnant seven years ago.When the Hollywood couple divorced in 2001, he agreed to pay her $1,200 a month in child support.But less than two years later, when his son was 5, he says he learned the awful truth: The boy he had raised as his own wasn't his.Parker sued his ex-wife, Margaret Parker,...
  • Supreme Court rules cities may seize homes

    06/23/2005 8:07:27 AM PDT · by Stew Padasso · 727 replies · 13,728+ views
    charlotte.com - AP ^ | Jun. 23, 2005 | HOPE YEN
    Supreme Court rules cities may seize homes HOPE YEN Associated Press WASHINGTON - A divided Supreme Court ruled that local governments may seize people's homes and businesses against their will for private development in a decision anxiously awaited in communities where economic growth conflicts with individual property rights. Thursday's 5-4 ruling represented a defeat for some Connecticut residents whose homes are slated for destruction to make room for an office complex. They argued that cities have no right to take their land except for projects with a clear public use, such as roads or schools, or to revitalize blighted areas....
  • Supreme Court Rules Cities May Seize Homes

    06/23/2005 10:12:39 AM PDT · by Pessimist · 28 replies · 1,381+ views
    Washington Post ^ | 6/23/05 | William Branigin
    The Supreme Court today effectively expanded the right of local governments to seize private property under eminent domain, ruling that people's homes and businesses -- even those not considered blighted -- can be taken against their will for private development if the seizure serves a broadly defined "public use." In a 5-4 decision, the court upheld the ability of New London, Conn., to seize people's homes to make way for an office, residential and retail complex supporting a new $300 million research facility of the Pfizer pharmaceutical company. The city had argued that the project served a public use within...