Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $35,069
43%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 43%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: sternreport

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Green Is the New Red: Global-warming hysteria was made to order for anti-capitalist militants.

    12/03/2009 5:18:34 AM PST · by Delacon · 12 replies · 861+ views
    National Review Online ^ | December 3, 2009 | Conrad Black
    Colossal spending and regulatory programs impend, based on the Al Gore conventional hysteria that unreduced carbon emissions will destroy the earth. This will eventually be seen as one of the modern world’s most inexplicable descents into public-policy madness. The basic relevant facts are that carbon emissions are not the principal, nor even a measurable, factor in global warming, and despite dire forecasts and ever-increasing carbon emissions in the world — especially as the economies of China and India, representing 40 percent of the world’s population, expand by 6 to 10 percent each year — the world has not grown...
  • A 50-50 chance that climate change will destroy civilisation this century?

    06/05/2008 7:43:09 PM PDT · by DeaconBenjamin · 62 replies · 205+ views
    Telegraph (UK) ^ | 05 Jun 2008 at 16:35 | Posted by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
    Lord Stern and Lord Giddens frightened the wits out of a Goldman Sachs audience I attended this week on the risks of a global water, food, and energy crisis. Without wishing to take a stand one way or the other on the bitterly polarized issue of climate change, I pass on some of their remarks so readers can judge for themselves. Nicholas Stern -- the author of the Government’s Stern Report on the economic effects of climate change, and former chief economist at the World Bank -- said we have a one in two chance of destroying civilization within the...
  • Stern Review (Bjørn Lomborg on the Global Warming Report)

    11/02/2006 11:02:21 AM PST · by The Raven · 12 replies · 717+ views
    Wall Street Journal ^ | Nov 2, 2006 | Bjørn Lomborg
    The report on climate change by Nicholas Stern and the U.K. government has sparked publicity and scary headlines around the world. Much attention has been devoted to Mr. Stern's core argument that the price of inaction would be extraordinary and the cost of action modest. Unfortunately, this claim falls apart when one actually reads the 700-page tome. Despite using many good references, the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change is selective and its conclusion flawed. Its fear-mongering arguments have been sensationalized, which is ultimately only likely to make the world worse off. The review correctly points out that...