Posted on 12/10/2007 7:07:25 AM PST by RogerFGay
It's hard to take someone seriously when they spout idiocy like this.
On topics like this, imbecilic hyperbole is probably not a useful approach.
That is hyperbole, but true to a certain extent.
Men need to find a good traditional woman - and they need to really get to know her and make sure she’s not just putting on a front.
>>>>>>>>>>>>It’s hard to take someone seriously when they spout idiocy like this.
Oh.. I don’t know. I posted the article by Dr. Baskerville.
Over 500 replies.
Seems lots and lots of folks take this seriously.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1925051/posts
So instead of committing suicide himself, he recommends suicide for the society. Great advice.
How about - find the right woman and get pre-marriage counseling so you know you found the right one...
Many by posters who found his "advice" as moronic as I found it.
You’re really shooting at the messanger. Informal surveys have already shown that many young men (as well as those who’ve already been around the block) are coming to the same conclusion on their own.
The advice I’ve given my son’s is not to marry before they are at least 25 and to check out and be throughly comfortable with the other family before marrying, especially the mother. You marry the girl, you marry the family.
” So instead of committing suicide himself, he recommends suicide for the society. Great advice.”
Killing the spouse may make more sense...
To which it must be added: and remain faithful to her.
Moron alert.
Yes ... as part of the initiative on public-private partnership, private companies will get billions in federal funding to outsource marriage and family. Don’t laugh - based on their actual record, it’s not entirely unlikely.
Are you warning people that you’ve entered the discussion?
what are the young mens options? Be gay, Be A sexual? that italisized statement is ridiculous
In a case like mine, where there are two working parents and both parties make roughly the same amount of money and share parental responsibility for the kids, child support is nothing more than a punishment to the “non-residential” parent (in my case, me). Because my son lives with his mother more than he lives with me (I have him 5 nights out of every 14 during the school year, and 7 out of every 14 during the summer), I was forced to submit to a support table that rewards her with the same amount of money that I’d pay if I had no custody or visitation rights at all. The amount of money that I pay each month was punitive based on the income that I was making at the time of the agreement ($340 plus medical insurance, which is now an additional $195 per month, based on $24,000 income at the time of the divorce. Incidentally, she was making $26,000 at the time.) Even at just $500 a month, the child support made it impossible for me to have any kind of a decent place to live, which forced me to live with my parents for about six years until I could recover financially from the devastation caused by the divorce. So, we have a support system that rewards one parent and punishes the other. The parent who gets punished is almost always the father. Sad, really.
You find it moronic. Great. So do I.
But that’s because you and I have never been a male victim of a twisted and feministic divorce-court system that is geared toward emasculating men.
I posted that thread. I read all 537 replies. I have 3 brothers who have been de-balled by so called family courts.
I completey understand why divorced fathers will argue: Do Not Marry. Do Not Have Children.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.