Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MARRIED AND FILING JOINTLY? DUE AN OBAMA “TAX CUT?” YOU’RE ABOUT TO GET UNDERTAXED
Roman Around ^ | 5 March 2009 | Andrew Roman

Posted on 03/05/2009 12:15:37 PM PST by andrew roman

yes_we_can_3

You thought the analogue-to-digital conversion box fiasco had people confused?

Just wait.

This is something I can guarantee the overwhelming vast majority of Americans are not aware of – and come next April 15th, there are going to be a whole lot of irate people frantically screaming at their payroll departments demanding to know what the hell happened.

And meanwhile, not one official from the Obama Administration – the folks who care so much about America’s working families – is bothering to inform anyone about it.

If you are married, and both you and your spouse are entitled to President Obama’s economy-saving blockbuster "tax cuts" – which would yield approximately $13 a week in your paycheck through the end of the year, followed by approximately $8 a week until the $800 total is reached – you had better pay your payroll department a little visit and change your status to “married, filing separately” (if you haven’t already) or adjust your withholding allowances, because it is entirely possible you’re going to owe the government money by next April 15th.

Why? How?

First, let’s go back to a press release from IRS commissioner Doug Shulman, issued at the end of February, regarding the implementation of Obama’s “tax cuts”:

For most taxpayers, the additional credit will automatically start showing up in their paychecks this spring. Since employers and payroll companies will handle this change, people typically won’t need to take any additional action.

That is, unless you are married and filing jointly.

As most Americans understand the Obama plan, if your payroll department lists your status as “married, filing jointly,” and you fall within the income guidelines, you qualify for the Obamarific $800 “tax cut” and your paychecks will be adjusted accordingly.

But ...

(Excerpt) Read more at romanaround.net ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: economy; obama; taxcuts; undertaxed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 03/05/2009 12:15:37 PM PST by andrew roman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: andrew roman
But ...

Darn.. can't see the but because site is blocked by firewall.. want to give us a hint?

2 posted on 03/05/2009 12:18:20 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
If both you and your spouse work, your payroll departments are each adjusting your withholding to reflect an $800 tax credit. It is suppossed to be an $800 tax credit per family, yet, if your two payroll departments are both adjusting for the full $800, your joint withholding is $1600, not the $800 as intended.

If you don't adjust your withholding to reflect this, you will end the year having a higher tax liability or a lessened refund.

3 posted on 03/05/2009 12:24:15 PM PST by TexasNative2000 (Obamamania - not terminal, but, sadly, it does have to run its four-year course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000

....according to this article......


4 posted on 03/05/2009 12:25:01 PM PST by TexasNative2000 (Obamamania - not terminal, but, sadly, it does have to run its four-year course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
You bet ... continuing the article...

But if your spouse files the same way at his or her job, he or she will also qualify for the same “tax cut.” Thus, by the time tax time rolls around next year, your "cut" could be twice and big as it was supposed to be, and you will owe that money back.

There is no cross-checking here between employers.

In a story that hasn’t gotten much play, Andrea Coombes, from Fox Business News writes:

But if you file a joint return with your spouse, and you both work, you should carefully review your withholding, because it's highly likely both employers, without knowledge of what the other is doing, will adjust withholding such that both spouses receive up to $800, for a total credit of $1,600.

"It's conceivable that if both are married-filing-joint and their income is not otherwise going to cause a phase-out [of the credit], they could get the double benefit," said Frank Keith, chief of communications for the IRS. "When they file their return, the actual credit they're entitled to is $800."

That means paying back up to $800 with your return, though Keith said the money paid out this year, and thus any tax bill later, likely would be slightly lower -- since the withholding adjustment starts close to midyear, the full credit won't be paid out in paychecks.

For some, what's effectively a loan from the government might be welcome. But others will find the big bill next year unwelcome. One way to prevent it: Adjust your withholding this year.

Note, too, that taxpayers who normally get a refund might simply see a reduced refund, rather than a bill, come April 2010. "A lot of people get refunds. If you're in that situation, it likely would just mean that your refund is lower," said Bob Scharin, senior tax analyst at Thomson Reuters' tax and accounting business. "But if you normally do not get a refund, you could find you owe more tax than you anticipated."

My wife is the controller of a large entity here in New York and knows the tax code in and out. Over the past week or so the finer details of the Obama plan are slowly becoming understood and the reality of married couples potentially being undertaxed by doing precisely what IRS commissioner Shulman suggested – that is, nothing - is hitting home, not only in my wife’s office, but in payroll departments everywhere.

At an APA (American Payroll Association) discussion group my wife has aceess to, moderated by CPP certified payroll professionals, one confused visitor posted:

“I am trying to figure out how the new tables work for a Married Couple, both working. In my little mind, if the new Percentage Method Withholding tables reduce the amount of tax withheld from someone claiming Married up to $800.00, then is it reasonable to think that if both spouses are claiming Married the amount of tax their withholding could be reduced as much as $1600.00? … So if both of the spouses fall into that bracket, they could in fact have a reduction of approx. $1,600.00. Which means that they might in fact have a tax liability at the end of the year. I called the IRS about this and after 5 transfers, all I got was, "well if they are both working then maybe they need to have additional tax withheld on their checks each pay period to make up for the short fall". WOW, give us a stimulus then make us have extra tax withheld each pay period. I am probably just not seeing the big picture and I hope someone can show me where my error is.”

The response:

You are correct. If both spouses work, their total withholding will be reduced by more than they are entitled to at the end of the year and they will owe the difference. The IRS has published the new Publication 15-T. In that publication, they have included a "Notice to Employees". This notice doesn't really state that married employees in lower brackets will be underwithheld, but I think this is the IRS's attempt at addressing the withholding issue.

I'm sure someone was going to get around to filling the American people in on it eventually. Andrew Roman Brooklyn, NY
5 posted on 03/05/2009 12:26:23 PM PST by andrew roman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

If you and your spouse are both “married filed jointly” for tax withholding purposes, you will get the credit twice and then owe one credit back.


6 posted on 03/05/2009 12:27:27 PM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: andrew roman

This was discussed on Limbaughs show last week. It is not a tax rate cut.

You could end up owing if you are not aware of this.


7 posted on 03/05/2009 12:29:39 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andrew roman

Thanks, will spread the news..


8 posted on 03/05/2009 12:29:42 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

Exactly.

It’s being discussed in some places, like on Limbaugh’s show, but I know there are plenty who aren’t aware of this yet.

Just doing my part.

Andrew Roman
Brooklyn, NY


9 posted on 03/05/2009 12:31:19 PM PST by andrew roman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: andrew roman; TexasNative2000

Why is this even being called a tax credit? Isn’t this just withholding less right now but you will still owe the same amount - this isn’t a tax reduction, just not withholding some that you normally would have withheld?


10 posted on 03/05/2009 12:31:28 PM PST by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Computer says No..... Carole Beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andrew roman

I’ve already arranged to increase my withholding. It is amazing how many people out there think they are getting some kind of a tax “cut”. Think they’re mad now about their investment values? Wait until next year....


11 posted on 03/05/2009 12:32:33 PM PST by andy58-in-nh (You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andrew roman

I wasn’t knocking ya! Thanks for getting the word out, shame the MSM can’t do its job to inform anyone of anything. ;^)


12 posted on 03/05/2009 12:33:46 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
Actually, it is an $800 credit per family. Problem is, it could be a $1,600 credit, with that additional $800 being due back to the Treasury.
13 posted on 03/05/2009 12:34:01 PM PST by TexasNative2000 (Obamamania - not terminal, but, sadly, it does have to run its four-year course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

LOL!

No, I didn’t think you were knocking me at all. I promise!

It’s amazing, because the people who work in the payroll department where my wife works - most of them ARDENT OBAMA SUPPORTERS - cannot believe that that the “government” is not cluing people in on this “oversight.”

I think most Americans will be shocked to hear about this little detail.

:)

Andrew Roman
Brooklyn, NY


14 posted on 03/05/2009 12:36:51 PM PST by andrew roman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000

So now my “tax Cut” is just $6.50 per week??

PRAISE THE ONE!!
HAIL THE MAGIC MESSIAH!!


15 posted on 03/05/2009 12:38:25 PM PST by tcrlaf ("Hope" is the most Evil of all Evils"-Neitzsche)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000

So if someone doesn’t elect to receive the extra $800 over the year in paychecks, his tax due next april would be $800 less than usual? I thought it was just an adjustment to what was being withheld and no real tax change had occured - merely a paperwork adjustment to what you normally had withheld. Am I making sense?


16 posted on 03/05/2009 12:43:57 PM PST by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Computer says No..... Carole Beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

Isn’t this just withholding less right now but you will still owe the same amount - this isn’t a tax reduction


My understanding of this is that the tax rates have not actually changed only the withholding amount. Come April 2010 you can expect to owe it all back. Take you $8 refund stick it in a savings account, collect the interest and kiss the rest goodbye next year.


17 posted on 03/05/2009 12:43:59 PM PST by boxerblues (Party like its 1773)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: andrew roman

Thank you SO MUCH for the “heads up”! I had heard this was just a WITHHOLDING reduction and could result in additional taxes next year. I’m already trying to make up for the loss of my child credit cause baby boy is now 18. This stinks!


18 posted on 03/05/2009 12:44:49 PM PST by RebelTXRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh

“Think they’re mad now about their investment values? Wait until next year....”

By then, it will not matter. The Sheeple will have been fooled just long enough for Obama to destroy what’s left ogf the American Economy....


19 posted on 03/05/2009 12:46:48 PM PST by tcrlaf ("Hope" is the most Evil of all Evils"-Neitzsche)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues

Thanks that is what I understood as well


20 posted on 03/05/2009 12:46:53 PM PST by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Computer says No..... Carole Beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson