See the Flopping Aces Blog for much more.... Additional Graphs also.
To: xcamel; SunkenCiv; Fred Nerks
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Hey, there is NOW A SUNSPOT! Call off global climate change denying! It just appeared about 2 or 3 days ago!
OH, wait a minute... this sunspot is more the size of a pinspot, and its just about dissipated anyways... never mind!
3 posted on
06/03/2009 2:42:20 PM PDT by
C210N
(A patriot for a Conservative Renaissance!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Should that broken-clock prediction hits its hour, then NASA is also predicting that solar cycle 24 will have the modest amplitude of the 1928 cycle, indicated by the red arrow. Taking a quick look at that chart, the 1928 cycle looks like it is roughly both the median and average cycle peak of the 80 years previous to 1928. But 1928 is also the minimum cycle peak for the 80 years after 1928.
Could it be that the sun is just reverting back to the norm after being above the norm for the last 80 years?
Perhaps what is described as the modest peak of 1928 will be the normal peak going forward from here.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Maunder invented chlorofluorocarbons!
It's man made cataclysm!
SUVs!
Ozone depletion!
Industrialization!
It's airplanes!
Auto exhaust!
Panic, and doom!
Tofu!
Tree cutting!
Electrical usage!
Cattle Flatulence!
Mass Hysteria!
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
.
.
.
thud
7 posted on
06/03/2009 2:45:03 PM PDT by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
There is no doubt about it. Is there any area of science that can be trusted to say the truth and not bow down to political correctness?
I doubt it.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; ...
14 posted on
06/03/2009 3:01:18 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I can verify that the data coming out of NASA is indeed selective. I worked for NASA for 12 years and can tell you that the chief scientist I worked under was most frustrated by the fact that the “research” in this area was driven almost entirely by grants which came only for those whose “research” was geared toward proving AGW. The raw data didn’t support it, but that’s where the money was, and still is.
15 posted on
06/03/2009 3:01:22 PM PDT by
ZGuy
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Baaack to the Futures!19 posted on
06/03/2009 3:13:20 PM PDT by
BIGLOOK
(Government needs a Keelhauling now and then.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The "official" Cycle 24 prediction is already wrong, since it's based on a 12/2008 minimum, however the minimum is actually no earlier than 4/2009.
Look for some cold winters ahead...
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus; markomalley
To: Starman417; tricky_k_1972; Jim Robinson; Delacon; neverdem
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I think I heard on the Weather Channel this morning that International Falls had a daily record low of 23 degrees. Broke the 1897 record of 26!
I have not confirmed this tidbit but first thought was the airheads are gonna say GW.
Buy fur
23 posted on
06/03/2009 3:28:28 PM PDT by
Rapunzel
(Never forget Fallujah..S. Helvenston RIP.....Sarah...Sarah...Sarah loves America)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; ...
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
35 posted on
06/03/2009 4:26:24 PM PDT by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
45 posted on
06/04/2009 8:59:29 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(Fight the Machine - STOP supporting the MSM.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
