Posted on 02/22/2010 8:40:39 AM PST by Denriddy
According to an article in the United Kingdom's Telegraph, in October of 2009, President Barack Obama's adivsor on Muslim affairs, Dalia Mogahed, went on Islamic television with members of the radical Islamic group Hizb ut Tahrir and defended their blatant call for the overthrow of all "man-made law"—which includes the United States Constitution—and the adoption of Islamic Sharia law as "the source of legislation"
(Excerpt) Read more at kumarforcongress.net ...
Dalia Mogahed at the World Affairs Council 10 21 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeShm8OTuk8
Daljit Dhaliwal interviews Dalia Mogahed
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2458619416990870703#
Dalia Mogahed: Who Speaks for Islam?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=886027736881885889#
>Isn’t attempting to overthrow the Constitution called Treason?
According to the Constitution, no... not unless you can [legally] prove that such an action would be giving aid and comfort to our enemies.
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
QUITE arguably though, it would be adhering to our enemies.
Then may be the violent overthrow the Constitution would be treason.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure they are all qualified, but does Barach have any cabinet members, czars, advisors whose
last name is Jones or Smith?
Other than the deposed communist Van Jones, no.
Better start considering Impeachment before this gang destroys our entire Constitution and takes over completely.
Maybe he was be facetious.
That website is really radical.
This nut job fanatic must go—imagine it was a Christian trying to impose the 10 commandments?
About half of US citizens hate the US and I have no regard for their life or safety at all.
>Then may be the violent overthrow the Constitution would be treason.
Who said anything about violent?
I would surmise that they will, if anything, simply write a federal law into existence embracing whatever it is they wish to, any prohibitions in the Constitution notwithstanding (ie ignored).
As a perfect example, I illustrate it on the more local level of state constitution and [contrary] state law:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2456318/posts?page=36#36 [see the second part]
The Radicals he surrounds himself with are stunning. The apathy of the citizens regarding this and other serious issues amazes me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.