Posted on 05/21/2011 7:04:00 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
Sarah Palin had some very strong words for President Obama tonight in reaction to his throwing Israel under the bus this week:
America is on the wrong side on this issue and that’s what the Prime Minister on Friday tried to explain to our president even though our president tried to lecture Prime Minister Netanyahu on the meaning of importance of peace. Netanyahu does not need to be lectured by President Obama on the importance of peace. He understands it. So we’re on the wrong side of history if we continue to go down this road.
What we need to do though Judge is ‘we the people’ need to rise up saying we’ll take a stand for Israel. We’ll be on their side even if our - I’m gonna call him our temporary leader because my goal is to make sure that President Obama is not reelected in 2012 so that we don’t have to continue to go down this path of this foreign policy that really makes no sense and in this particular case is so obviously wrong because we’re telling our friends to negotiate with Hamas, with terrorists, who have already said – Hamas has said we’ll never negotiate with Israel.
So until President Obama is replaced by a president who understands the importance of treating our friends right and being strong against our enemies, until that happens it’s we the people who have to rise up and make sure Israel knows they have friends here.
It was a great interview. Enjoy!
You can maintain this Cain fixation for as long as you care to, but it won’t get you any closer to reality than where you are now.
Now, if Cain can get traction, I’d consider him, for sure, just as I would have Duncan Hunter in 2008. But it’s never gonna happen.
Cain is the one who could act as a agent of influence on behalf of someone who can actually win - like Sarah Palin.
“She sounds more like someone looking to campaign for a particular person than be a candidate herself.”
Funny it doesn’t sound that way to me at all.....All of her recent interviews sound like a stump speech pointing out what we need in a candidate.....The thing is, it is obvious that she fits the bill....And I don’t believe it is coincidental....Palin 2012.....
Sarah Palin spoke very nicely about Hermain Cain and said she would like to shake his hand and I’m sure she’ll have the chance!
:)
I don’t see her endorsing any of the candidates currently in the field, because soon enough, she’s going to be candidate herself!
I’m solidly with Sarah Palin awaiting her decision, but I’m sure not about to knock any of our Conservatives unless or until they start knocking Sarah Palin.
Fair Warning!
As long as she calls “President” this criminal usurper, she stands no chance.
I hope you’re right. There’s a big place for Herman Cain in the future if he plays his cards right. Unfortunately, I’m not optimistic about it. That’s JMHO.
I like Herman cain. Just to be clear...
LOLOLOL. REDNECK WOMAN!!!! I might get it after tonight!
Palin endorsing Cain would be best!
Yeah, I do too, he’s “in it to win it” - sound familiar?
“Cain, as an unknown, has no pre-existing negative opinion of him out there.”
His support of Romney shows either a lack of doing proper homework on a candidate, or agreeing with Romney policies which is definitely not acceptable for me.......BTW she will not lose BADLY.....Where do you folks come off using that same weak arguement when we all agree that the race would have been a landslide in 2008 for Obama if Palin HAD NOT been on the ticket?....
Palin/Cain or Palin/West would work for me. No RINO’s!
“Who was the last candidate that didn’t have pre-existing negatives?”
Barack. Th only pre-existing anything he had was a coke problem.
I like Palin. If nominated, she’s lose at least 40 states, though. That’s a sad fact. She’s been permanently tarred by the MSM.
Hank
Good! I like hearing that!
It’s really hard to say what would have happened.
Yes, Palin mobilized conservatives.
However, from my side in Maryland where there are few real conservatives and only slightly more RINOs, I know more people who DIDN’T vote for McCain because of Palin than the other way around.
I don’t know (and nobody really knows) what the net benefit was.
Also, Palin has never been more popular than she was the day McCain chose her.
Palin endorsed McCain in his Senate race. I presume as a loyalty thing which I can respect.
Cain supported Romney probably for the reason many of us did that won’t do it again. He seemed to be an astute businessman who looked like the best alternative at the time (Fred Thompson had dropped out by the time the primary got to MD or I’d have voted for him).
LOL...even I give her a bit more credit than that.
Although I have been hyperbolic in saying she’d lose like Mondale or Goldwater, in reality she might do as well as Dole.
How do you figure?
(I’m being serious)
A goal likely go be accomplished during the primaries.
As it was with Carter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.