Beam me to Planet Gore !
And things are getting really warm, and it is not the climate that is warm, but the exposure of the Perps of this scam.
HA! HA!
Two questions: 1.) What is the title of Henrik’s article in Nature?
2.) Is there ANYTHING about testing, cause and effect, or dependent variables?
It continues: The more we know, the more we know we don’t know.
Creation is an incredibly complex system. It appears that we have not but skimmed the surface of the depth of that interactive system.
That money wan’t wasted. Money given to Democrats is never “wasted”. Somebody has to give money to the Democrat Party.
Thanks for posting this. I’ll have something to read during my lunch break.
Ah, but don’t expect the religion of environazism to go away. Watch how they bitterly cling to their warmist beliefs. Lackiing anything else to believe in, like God or the Second Amendment, their sanity will burst if their little environazi bubble pops.
“...Svensmark put the alarmist predictions at risk – and with them the billions of dollars flowing from anxious governments into the global warming enterprise.”
Says it all.
The media will try to pounce tonight to show that Republicans are stupid.
A smart Republican will be ready to trot out these latest findings and to delcare categorically that AGW is a hoax and a fraud. Pull no punches. The truth is coming out, so get out in front of the truth.
Global Warming on Free Republic
What do Climate Scientists bring to the table in the discussion by physicists of atmospheric changes?
A: The coffee
Thanks for the ping. Nature is an excellent peer-reviewed publication. The following is from the summary of the article that you provided the link for:
“However, the fraction of these freshly nucleated particles that grow to sufficient sizes to seed cloud droplets, as well as the role of organic vapours in the nucleation and growth processes, remain open questions experimentally. “
The last 4 words are the scientific equivalence of CYA. No proof yet, but a good attempt to model the system in the laboratory.
Science is an endless attempt to prove oneself wrong. Failing to do so we request our peers to prove us wrong. After considerable testing of suggested cause and effect, we begrudgingly admit that we COULD be correct in our speculation.
Ah, if only politics was that way - - - -, sigh.