Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thrown Over The Fence (Mom strangles infant. Judge slaps her wrists)
Albert Mohler blog ^ | Friday, September 16, 2011 | Dr. Albert Mohler

Posted on 09/23/2011 8:13:36 PM PDT by This Just In

Thrown Over the Fence — Infanticide, Canadian Style

If we will not defend life in the womb, eventually the dignity of every single human life is thrown over the fence.

Friday, September 16, 2011

Mark Steyn hit the nail on the head when he accused a Canadian appeals court of allowing for a “fourth-trimester abortion” — that’s right, the killing of a baby that is already born.

The case emerged from the Court of Queen’s Bench in Alberta, where a judge faced the fact that a woman had been convicted of strangling her newborn son and then throwing the baby’s body over the fence into her neighbor’s yard.

As CBC News reported, the woman was given a three-year suspended sentence and will spend no time in jail for the killing of her baby. Katrina Efferts “will have to abide by conditions for the next three years but she won’t spend time behind bars for strangling her own son.” Justice Joanne Veit, whose name should now go down in legal and moral infamy, tied this woman’s act of infanticide to Canada’s lack of legal restrictions on abortion. The judge’s decision stated that “while many Canadians undoubtedly view abortion as a less than ideal solution to unprotected sex and unwanted pregnancy, they generally understand, accept and sympathize with the onerous demands pregnancy and childbirth exact from mothers, especially mothers without support.”

She continued: “Naturally, Canadians are grieved by an infant’s death, especially at the hands of the infant’s mother, but Canadians also grieve for the mother.” She also stated that the Canadian approach is a “fair compromise of all the interests involved.”

Two juries had found Effert guilty of second-degree murder, but an appeals court had reduced her conviction to infanticide.

Mark Steyn got right to the point:

(Excerpt) Read more at albertmohler.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: moralabsolutes
"We have seen this coming. As far back as 1993, ethicist Peter Singer was arguing openly that babies “are not born self-aware, or capable of grasping that they exist over time. They are not persons.” He went on to argue that “the life of a newborn is of less value than the life of a pig, a dog, or a chimpanzee.” Singer, to our shame, now holds an honored chair in ethics at Princeton University." ~ Dr. Albert Mohler

Moral bankruptcy includes the total corruption of sanity and sound reasoning.

1 posted on 09/23/2011 8:13:44 PM PDT by This Just In
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: This Just In
Two juries had found Effert guilty of second-degree murder, but an appeals court had reduced her conviction to infanticide.

Never will understand that one. You kill an adult, and there is some chance the guy deserves it. Babies are incapable of deserving death. Their murder should be considered worse than murder of an adult.

2 posted on 09/23/2011 8:24:02 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Its because infants can’t vote liberal.


3 posted on 09/23/2011 8:36:42 PM PDT by BigCinBigD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Their murder should be considered worse than murder of an adult.

I agree. Baby harp seals get more sympathy than this human baby! So much for the right to life in Canada. They are trying to out do Europe in this regard, it seems.

4 posted on 09/23/2011 8:51:31 PM PDT by ARepublicanForAllReasons (Crony Capitalism & Unionboot-licking Marxist politicians are our undoing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

Simple is best.

Close your f’ing legs and keep the tiny appendage in your pants.


5 posted on 09/23/2011 9:58:18 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

A worried woman went to her gynecologist and said: ‘Doctor, I have a serious problem and desperately need your help! My baby is not even 1 year old and I’m pregnant again. I don’t want kids so close together. So the doctor said: ‘OK and what do you want me to do?’ She said: ‘I want you to end my pregnancy, and I’m counting on your help with this.’ The doctor thought for a little, and after some silence he said to the lady: ‘I think I have a better solution for your problem. It’s less dangerous for you too.’ She smiled, thinking that the doctor was going to accept her request. Then he continued: ‘You see, in order for you not to have to take care 2 babies at the same time, let’s kill the one in your arms. This way, you could rest some before the other one is born. If we’re going to kill one of them, it doesn’t matter which one it is. There would be no risk for your body if you chose the one in your arms. The lady was horrified and said: ‘No doctor! How terrible! It’s a crime to kill a child! ‘I agree’, the doctor replied. ‘But you seemed to be OK with it, so I thought maybe that was the best solution.’ The doctor smiled, realizing that he had made his point. He convinced the mom that there is no difference in killing a child that’s already been born and one that’s still in the womb. The crime is the same! If you agree, please SHARE. Together we can help save precious lives! “Love says I sacrifice myself for the good of the other person. Abortion says I sacrifice the other person for the good of myself...” Jesus Christ sacrificed Himself for the good of sinners! THats perfect love


6 posted on 09/23/2011 10:56:28 PM PDT by celticfreedom (the most precious jewels you'll ever have around your neck are the arms of your children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: celticfreedom
Amen .............................. FRegards
7 posted on 09/24/2011 1:07:27 AM PDT by gonzo ( Buy more ammo, dammit! You should already have the firearms ... FRegards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

The liberal progressive mantra that we are all a part of the collective leaves no one to blame for anything, or so they think. Your are judged by your actions as an individual.


8 posted on 09/24/2011 4:42:51 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson