Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MrShoop; sickoflibs
On the other hand, destroying her in court might win the lawsuit, but alienate women to Rush and conservatives. Surely the MSM would just portray it like attacking a rape victim as ‘asking for it’. This whole thing is a mess and distracts from the real issue of religious freedom.

Excellent point. A kind of "suicide bomber" plaintiff, who risks no financial skin of her own, because even if she gets slapped with court costs, rich commies would come out of the woodwork, not only to pay her legal expenses, but also to set up a scholarship fund in her name.

And Obama and the leftist media would love it.

65 posted on 03/05/2012 12:43:28 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; MrShoop
RE :”Excellent point. A kind of “suicide bomber” plaintiff, who risks no financial skin of her own, because even if she gets slapped with court costs, rich commies would come out of the woodwork, not only to pay her legal expenses, but also to set up a scholarship fund in her name.

I imagine a lawsuit would not even start until after the election.

If she is considered a public figure under the law like Palin, Rush, Obama are, then it's pretty hard to sue for slander under the law.

69 posted on 03/05/2012 12:50:37 PM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson