Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Scoutmaster
Wow. A little more reading and I'm not certain that Sandra Fluke would be considered a limited public figure for purposes of Sullivan.

You're required to conducted a particularized determination, according to Bruno & Stillman, 633 F.2d 583 (1980). So not everybody's going to agree on whether Sandra Fluke is a limited public figure.

And the fact that everybody knows who she is now doesn't help Limbaugh. The question is whether she was a limited public figure when she completed her presentation, and before Limbaugh launched into her.

That's because, if the main controversy that made the person a public figure is the alleged defamation itself, then the defendant can't point to that controversy as making the plaintiff a limited public figure. "Those charged with defamation cannot, by their own conduct, create their own defense by making the claimant a public figure." Hutchinson v. Proxmire, 443 U.S. 111, 135.

68 posted on 03/05/2012 12:46:36 PM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Scoutmaster

BS. Fluke postured for her position on TV before Congress. She is a public figure by any definition. She wasn’t summonsed to Congress. She wasn’t forced in any way to be on TV. She, herself, claims to be a public advocate. She also advocated using public funds for her sexual entertainment on broadcast television before Congress. Sorry, but you can’t lay claim she is a private person.


115 posted on 03/05/2012 3:58:05 PM PST by CodeToad (NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson