Given that UCLA is taxpayer funded i’m sure that this brainless study was brought to you by the taxes of hard working Californians.
A good looking boy is not necessarily good...Apache proverb
Rush has been unabashedly honest: Feminizism was created to give ugly women a chance to have a say.
The proliferation of ugly guys as part of that is just the law of attractive unattractiveness.
I find this fascinating. I never thought romney was all that.
I just told my wife she was highly competent.
Then I showed her this thread.
Tonight will be a good night.
My sister has cast her vote based on looks in every election save 2008. She would not vote for Obama.
I really think this is one reason the founding fathers withheld the vote from women.
Remember that Kerry/Edwards line “we have better hair”.
Pretty sure that would be classified as RAAAACIST if said by Romney/Ryan.
But....they do!
I have to say Paul Ryan reminds me so much of my dad. My dad had those same very Irish looks, with the dark hair and the blue eyes, and he was imperturbable like Ryan is.
I wish both my parents were still alive, they would have liked this ticket and they most certainly would have voted for them.
I guess Romney can be deemed ‘attractive’ in some quarters. But it’s in a sort of department-store mannequin way. He reminds me of someone who might be cast as a caracature of a politician in an old sitcom. Handsome, says the right things, but awfully plastic.
Terrible criteria, but... based on looks, the ones they picked are the best looking. Sarah, Mitt, Paul Ryan are are tops in political looks.
Mitt is far, far, far down the list of lookers, imo.
If it was based on looks, Rick Perry would be the nominee.
would have been a great ticket, too
BTTT