Posted on 09/07/2018 2:46:38 PM PDT by LevonRiver
Wednesday, 18 March 2015 Donald Trump announces formation of a “presidential exploratory committee,” and that he will not review the contract for his TV show.
And then, in one of the weirdest “coincidences” we’ve ever encountered, less than two weeks after Donald Trump’s 18 March announcement …
Tuesday, 7 April 2015 Svetlana Lokhova—the Russian graduate of Cambridge University, and “the daughter of a Russian shipping magnate” who had been connected with Michael Flynn at the Cambridge Intelligence Seminar by Stefan Halper and Richard Dearlove on or about 6 February 2014 [see above]—is awarded £3.2 million [a little over $4.1 million] by the Central London Employment Tribunal for “sexual harassment” while working at the “London branch of Russian bank Sberbank CIB” as an “equity saleswoman.”
Tuesday, 16 June 2015 At Trump Tower in New York City, Donald Trump officially announces that he is running for President of the United States.
And then on the next day …
Wednesday, 17 June 2015 Michael Flynn registers the Flynn Intel Group, Inc. in Wilmington, Delaware. [NOTE: This is the corporation, Flynn Intel Group, Inc., NOT the limited liability partnership, Flynn Intel Group LLC, that Flynn had registered several months earlier, on 23 October 2014 (see above) in Virginia. From our experience, this is an unmistakable fingerprint of a CIA/Deep State op, creating a “twosie” to intentionally create confusion, and to obfuscate dates. This date of incorporation also, in our analysis, is the entire reason why CIA mouthpieces such as The Washington Post and The New York Times have consistently avoided stating the distinction between the two different entities, or, importantly, this crucial date on which the corporation was registered.]
(Excerpt) Read more at chaletbooks.com ...
Sure it is. Businesses do it all the time. That's where the CIA learned it.
>Total BS from a total BS source.
Well, that’s odd, because I find at least 12 different sources for their facts linked to in the article. Which of those are “BS sources”?
Why do you only post Chalet Reports ‘articles’, since your 11/16 sign up date?
Are you affiliated, in any way, with Chalet Reports?
Just curious.
Do you never tire of pimping that website?
.
Flynn was booted by Obama for investigating pedophiles.
That was why Trump wanted him. He was no plant.
He made the mistake of moving too fast on his assignment, and being too zealous.
.
He has an agenda.
>Why do you only post Chalet Reports ‘articles’, since your 11/16 sign up date?
Because they do investigative research work and analysis that I have not found anywhere else, and that I think is worth sharing with others—and they provide the results of that work for free. A friend with mutual interests first introduced that site to me around the time that I also first found out about Free Republic.
If you know of any—ANY—other sites that have the kind of unique information I find there on some of the topics they cover that are important to me, please—PLEASE—by all means, let me know where it is.
>Are you affiliated, in any way, with Chalet Reports?
I’ve bought several of their books, and have emailed them a few times to thank them for their work, and to send them some info I’ve found that was relevant to a couple of their articles. Does that count?
I suggest you email them if you have some problem with them. I’ve found them very responsive and decent to deal with.
Are you David Reznor or Ashton Gray?
>Are you David Reznor or Ashton Gray?
No. My friends call me Elvis, but some of my enemies say my name is Legion.
Are you Madonna or Mae West?
No, and I don’t post from the same blog, every time I post a thread.
You haven’t answered my original question.....
What was your previous FR name?
>Flynn was HATED by the Obama administration
Well, I happen to believe that rumors of that hatred have been greatly exaggerated.
>I believe Flynn was naive and a little dense
The naive and the dense do not become head of the Defense Intelligence Agency. Ever.
Ma’am—and I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt—I’ve attempted to be polite to you and answer your overbearing questions and demands, because I’m just a down-home guitar plunker who was raised in a good Southern Baptist home, and I was taught that’s how a lady should be treated, even a shrewish one.
But I believe I’ve pretty much reached my limit on your cyber stalking. If and when I inadvertently break a rule here, I will answer, cap in hand, to the moderators, but in the meantime I will post here those articles and that information that I, in my sole discretion—not yours—think is useful information for the greater good.
Your jurisdiction doesn’t extend over me. Is that clarified simply enough?
You won’t answer the question.
Tells me all I need to know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.