Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tucker Carlson: What If States Decide To Ignore A Supreme Court With Kavanaugh On It?
RCP Video ^ | 10-5-2018 | Ian Schwartz

Posted on 10/05/2018 12:47:11 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot

Tucker Carlson said, "We've heard self-described anti-racism activists embrace full-throated racism on television," in the opening monologue of the Thursday broadcast of his FOX News show. Carlson also warned that some states may view Brett Kavanaugh as illegitimate and just ignore Supreme Court rulings.

"Going forward, look for the Left to delegitimize any decisions written by Brett Kavanaugh from the court or even any decisions in which he is the majority," Carlson advised. "Some states may just decide to ignore the Supreme Court."

"Sound far-fetched to you?" he asked. "Maybe. Maybe not."

"Look what's happening in California right now," Carlson said. "Lawmakers in that state, the largest state in the Union have already made it a crime for citizens in California to assist in the enforcement of any federal immigration law. California is in effect in open revolt against the laws of the United States."

"Suppose the Supreme Court were to try to crack down on that, it's not impossible to imagine California simply refusing to comply because Brett Kavanaugh sits on the court," he wondered. "Its edicts are illegitimate. That could happen. And that, by the way, is what crisis actually looks like, so get ready for that."

Carlson also pointed out the irony that Democrats now believe the FBI is involved in a "deep state" cover up because the supplementary probe did not yield any information they could use. His monologue:

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
You know it's coming.
1 posted on 10/05/2018 12:47:11 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

sure, but that can work both ways.


2 posted on 10/05/2018 12:48:37 PM PDT by delapaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

They are to be ignored because they will do that to ANYONE who gains a SCOTUS seat while Trump is President.

Time to check what the Founding Fathers would gave done.


3 posted on 10/05/2018 12:50:22 PM PDT by madison10 (Pray for President Trump, Judge Kavanaugh, Jeff Flake and their families)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Imagine how many blue states would turn red if that happened? Seriously [seriesly/]


4 posted on 10/05/2018 12:50:37 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

If they did, it would strengthen States Rights.


5 posted on 10/05/2018 12:51:25 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
SCOTUS: "Stay of execution"

Some state: "Mmm, nah >zap<"

6 posted on 10/05/2018 12:51:25 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Then Trump declares them in a state of insurrection. Their representation in Congress is removed.


7 posted on 10/05/2018 12:53:07 PM PDT by matt1234 (Jan. 20, 2017: the national nightmare ended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

I would say that said action qualifies as an ACT OF WAR.


8 posted on 10/05/2018 12:53:54 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Ed & Academia are the FARM TEAM for more Marxists coming, infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

And... should be treated as such.


9 posted on 10/05/2018 12:54:26 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Ed & Academia are the FARM TEAM for more Marxists coming, infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delapaz

You’re correct and that’s the way it should have been since the mid-30s.


10 posted on 10/05/2018 12:55:02 PM PDT by Founding Father (The Pedophile moHAMmudd [PBUH---Pigblood be upon him]; Charles Martel for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Bring it


11 posted on 10/05/2018 12:55:17 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberal is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

That, will be the beginning of something big, and the real catalyst for Civil War.


12 posted on 10/05/2018 12:55:38 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is what I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Never happen.

Those states would lose their federal funding in a heartbeat.

Holding on to idiot liberal values only goes so far....


13 posted on 10/05/2018 12:56:36 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Nullification.

I’m OK with that.


14 posted on 10/05/2018 12:57:03 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

And Lincoln had a response when some states went into rebellion.

If Trump had the military arrest Gov Moonbeam and transport him to Gitmo, it might have some impact.


15 posted on 10/05/2018 12:59:00 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
Shut off the valve!


16 posted on 10/05/2018 12:59:42 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (Trump: "I am Batman!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

At some point you have to draw the line. There is coming a time when the left will ignore the judiciary the way it ignores the Congress and President. The question is what do you do then? At that point I think the President send US Marshall’s and they begin arresting governors, AG’s and legislators for high treason. We had this argument in 1861. Trump is the only President I see having the balls to do this.


17 posted on 10/05/2018 1:03:51 PM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

“Suppose the Supreme Court were to try to crack down on that...”

What does that even mean?


18 posted on 10/05/2018 1:04:23 PM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

That’s an easy one. YOu arrest the leaders, the politicians fermenting anarchy.


19 posted on 10/05/2018 1:04:48 PM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

If it was not okay in 1861, it is not all right now. The Government has to react or there is no nation. I am a Southerner and a conservative but the Government must enforce it’s laws. If laws are not enforced, anarchy will be next.


20 posted on 10/05/2018 1:05:06 PM PDT by Himyar (Comes A Stillness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson