[CharleysPride]

Great, why did she not choose to share it with Tucker Carlson and his audience?

Put up or shut up, Lin, your word means nothing.

[Jeepers43]

"Put up or shut up, Lin, your word means nothing."

Of course. And the Tonight With Tucker Carlson TV show is not a court of law.

[cgbg]

The Trump team will choose what they want to share when they want to share it.

The President has always been a master of Sun Tzu—”The Art of War”.

Have you been elected President with a zillion to one odds against you?

Thought not.

Just chill.

[sauropod]

Rly? He’s got a pretty good track record.

[battletank]

Uh. Because lawyers don’t prove their case to a talk show host. They gather it altogether and present it in a court of law. Tucker may think he is some big swinging dick. He is now reminded he is not. At all. Sheesh.

[LilFarmer]

Wood already has a lawsuit filed on 11/13, plus a TRO filed Wednesday that was denied but he is appealing to the 11th circuit. How does anyone not know that by now?

[ConservativeInPA]

Trolling again, huh?

[MIA_eccl1212]

You never see the evidence against you until it’s too late for you to run.

It’s funny to watch and listen to Democrat operators and supporters try to figure out what they’re up against.

In a word:
Annihilation.

[NautiNurse]

Great, why did she not choose to share it with Tucker Carlson and his audience?

Any curiosity about why Tucker Carlson didn’t investigate Dominion/SmartMatic himself? Apparently, the info Powell obtained was ripe for the picking via internet search. Instead of investigative journalism, Carlson chose to solicit spoon-fed evidence which he could then regurgitate with editorial comments. Lazy.

[noiseman]

”Great, why did she not choose to share it with Tucker Carlson and his audience?”

For the same reason Bill Belichick doesn’t go on the Tonight Show a week before the Super Bowl and tell everyone all about his game plan (well, he doesn’t have that problem anymore, but you know what I mean).

[MayflowerMadam]

“why did she not choose to share it with Tucker Carlson and his audience?”

That’s funny. Whose side are you on, anyway?

[SamAdams76]

Great, why did she not choose to share it with Tucker Carlson and his audience?

I was not aware that the Tucker Carlson Show has jurisdiction in this case.

[lepton]

Great, why did she not choose to share it with Tucker Carlson and his audience?

---

Oh, there’s plenty of reason for that. Her place to share it is in court.

The main argument to be had is that some people insist she HAS given evidence, when she has only given evidence of possibility.

On Giuliani’s side, there is plenty of evidence out there and that they have given. The only questions are scope and resolution.