Shouldn’t the election process in the contested swing states also need to prove the election was honest and fair?
The acceptance of the result by the certifying authority is the proof.
More than that? A never ending wrangle transferring whatever authority is left to the political branches to lawyers.
Remember that Trump is unAmerican for even suggesting there was fraud. The Dems/MSM/Courts are controlling the narrative.
Since Dr Nia is the expert he should provide pointers on the easiest/quickest methods to validate his assertions. He failed to provide the roadmap to prove his points.
So IMHO his analysis is lacking.