Don’t be ridiculous. (I know you can’t do that.) No President, who was confident in their citizenship status, would dignify the accusation with any response whatsoever. That is obvious ... to the mentally competent.
As for the two versions, I wasn’t making a point about the validity of either document on that basis. Something you would know if you had ever looked into this subject more than superficially.
As far as those two versions, I know that his first submission to the public was actually a CLB (certificate of live birth) not a BC. The second submission was supposedly a BC. Both were amateurish fakes easily debunked in several ways each.
As for me I have one BC. I don’t have a CLB because you have to request one to get one and I haven’t.
That was what he did for several years. It was taken as evidence that he didn't have a valid birth certificate. So, as I said, he couldn't win either way.
I know that his first submission to the public was actually a CLB (certificate of live birth) not a BC. The second submission was supposedly a BC.
That is a distinction without a difference. The first document was a "Certification of Live Birth" because it was computer generated. The second was a "Certificate of Live Birth" because it was filled out on a typewriter in an earlier time. Both were the state's current version of birth certificates. Neither was a "Certificate of Hawaiian Birth" issued to someone whose actual birth was unrecorded.
Both were amateurish fakes easily debunked in several ways each.
The "debunkings" were amateurish. Some by people who expected a manual typewriter to produce computer generated accuracy. Other "debunkings" were just people assuming that the document was obviously fake.
As for me I have one BC. I don’t have a CLB because you have to request one to get one and I haven’t.
Request either or both and see what you get.
Don’t be ridiculous. (I know you can’t do that.) ... That is obvious ... to the mentally competent.
Everything around here is insults nowadays. Sad.