Dead Man Walking.
Posted on 02/06/2022 2:56:51 PM PST by blam
It all began 42 years ago — Ted Turner’s creation of a 24/7 news network that would exist on something called cable TV. Few believed it could succeed.
And, for its first decade, CNN largely chugged along but wasn’t seen as a game-changer or a true competitor to big broadcast news entities based in New York in the form of CBS, NBC and ABC. That all changed when war broke out between the United States and Iraq in 1991.
On the night war exploded over Baghdad, CNN was the only news organization that was able to broadcast from the city under siege as the U.S. onslaught began, all courtesy of the CNN team’s ability to convince the Iraqi government to grant them a line out of the city to broadcast, one that the competition could not secure.
“How CNN Won the War” was the glowing headline from the Washington Post on a story that perfectly chronicled the events that led to CNN officially becoming a major player. And off it went.
Until 2002, CNN was No. 1 in the cable news race. But competition that hadn’t existed before ended its dominance forever, primarily in the form of Fox News and, to a lesser extent, MSNBC. Despite the ratings results, CNN continued to carry itself as a credible, facts-first network of integrity that leaned heavily on solid reporting with a sprinkling of opinion and infotainment mixed in via programs such as “Larry King Live” and “Crossfire.”
In 2013, the network hired former NBC Universal president Jeff Zucker to take the reins as ratings continued to be below average at best. This gave Zucker a mandate to radically change the network from its journalistic roots of more than three decades — the months-long wall-to-wall coverage of a missing Malaysian airliner being an early example.
But two years later, the move to insert heavy doses of partisan opinion into its news reports only accelerated when Donald Trump – a Zucker hire at NBC for “The Apprentice” – jumped in to the 2016 presidential race. At first, CNN bear-hugged Trump’s every move. (Hillary Clinton’s giving a speech somewhere? Screw it. Let’s show an empty Trump podium with chyrons stating “Trump to speak soon” instead.) The real estate mogul’s 17 Republican challengers never had a shot; Trump blotted out the sun in terms of media coverage on his way to winning the nomination.
At that point, Zucker and CNN began to worry. Because while it was a ratings boon for the network to make Trump the centerpiece, there was growing concern that the guy could actually beat Hillary and become the nation’s 45th president. So Zucker unleashed the hounds, but it was too late. Trump would go on to shock the world in November 2016.
Undeterred, CNN decided there would be no honeymoon period for the new president. Talk about Russian collusion handing Trump the White House began even before the inauguration. And after the nonstop Trump-bashing, Harvard University concluded that CNN led the way, along with Zucker’s former home of NBC, in giving Trump 93 percent negative coverage in his first 100 days.
For the next four years, CNN served as the leading media resistance to Trump, throwing objectivity out the window. And after Joe Biden got elected, the network cheered the new president as it had throughout the entire campaign while still making Trump a prime centerpiece for over-the-top negative coverage despite his being out of office.
But as much as CNN tried to resurrect its lead character – who was banned from social media and largely off the grid for the year – his absence clearly showed the network was a one-trick partisan pony. Ratings fell 90 percent overall when comparing January 2021 to January 2022. That’s hard to do.
Which brings us to the events of this week: Zucker released a statement saying he had to resign because of a consensual affair with a female executive named Allison Gollust. WarnerMedia apparently has a rule against this, so Zucker – instead of a slap on the wrist for a benign offense – simply had to go abruptly.
Nobody believed this excuse. Turns out they may have had plenty of reason to be skeptical.
Per several reports, Zucker and Gollust allegedly advised then Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D-N.Y.) – the older brother of then-CNN anchor Chris Cuomo – on what to say during his COVID-19 daily briefings in the spring of 2020. They also reportedly told Cuomo how to respond to and how to criticize then-President Trump, to make it more compelling TV. (Gollust is a former communications director for Andrew Cuomo.)
Let’s unpack all of this:
In the spring of 2020, the country was in a horrific place. Businesses shut completely; people were scared. There were no COVID therapeutics, no vaccines. Hospitals were overwhelmed, thousands were dying each day. If ever there was a time for news organizations to educate and inform the public, this was it.
Instead, Zucker apparently believed it was the perfect time to exploit the situation for political gain and to help the network’s ratings.
Andrew Cuomo benefitted from briefings that made him appear to be the adult in the room regarding COVID and Trump appear to be the villain. Cuomo got a $5.1 million book deal as a result.
Chris Cuomo and Zucker/Gollust/CNN benefitted from marathon interviews with Cuomo’s governor/brother, which didn’t touch the governor’s alleged nursing home scandal. Ratings soared.
So, was Zucker’s departure simply about a consensual relationship with a co-worker? One might be forgiven for questioning that.
Moving forward, what’s next for CNN when the company falls under the Discovery Channel umbrella later this year? Let’s hear from its soon-to-be largest shareholder, John Malone of Liberty Media.
“I would like to see CNN evolve back to the kind of journalism that it started with, and actually have journalists, which would be unique and refreshing,” Malone said in an interview that recently aired on CNBC.
The collapse of CNN is now complete: Nine-out-of-ten viewers, gone. Its top-rated anchor, Chris Cuomo, gone. Its network president, gone. Its integrity in shambles.
Oh, and new management coming in that is signaling big-time changes … changes that may bring CNN back to the proud network it once was before Jeff Zucker destroyed it.
When Don Lemon is fired, that is when the collapse is near completion. You can bet Chris Cuomo has hinted to Don that he (Don) should have already quit CNN ‘out of loyalty to their long friendship’. Don’s likely reply: “Chris, I have no friends at CNN, only co-workers. Enjoy spending time with your family!”
CNN’s collapse will be complete when there is no longer a CNN.
Ted Turner on the Meaning of Life, the Trouble with Religion, and His Revision of the 10 Commandments
https://www.themarginalian.org/2014/11/19/ted-turner-meaning-of-life/
Agreed. It’s irretrievably damaged goods. I wonder why someone with $$$ hasn’t created a truly nonpartisan mostly-news network . . . like the BBC but gently center-right rather than far left. Heaven knows international news coverage in the U.S. is abysmal.
CNN succeeded as a propaganda outlet for the DNC/China.
Please, please let it happen. The only thing I liked about cnn was the voice of James Earl Jones.
They should brand as META-CNN, worked so well for Fakebook.
Communism has collapsed a zillion times already, but like a weed it keeps growing back.
Not at all. Its a deep-state operation that will stay around, regardless. It will continue to "hire" analysts like John Brennan, Andrew McCabe, and James Clapper to give it "gravitas" and speak the deep-state propaganda. And we'll keep responding to them.
Just look at the career of "famous" neocon Bill Krystal. Literally no one buys his books, his pathetic magazine failed, no one will pay to hear him speak, or attend even if its free. Yet somehow, he has been around and touted as a "serious foreign policy analyst" for 30 years. Why? Because the corrupt media and deep state put him in front of us, and tell America he's famous - and we believe it.
Its the power of propaganda.
In effect it is being sold for parts. It remains to be seen what will be built from them.
Yes, and to get their line out of Baghdad, they did for the first time what they now do routinely: suck up to the regime in charge. Tell the story the authorities want to tell and the truth/facts be damned.
Who was it? Peter Arnett, IIRC, was model for Baghdad Bob. Was he the goof that reported from the bombed out “Baby Milk Factory?”
The problem is nobody will ever trust CNN again. Its brand is now toxic.
They could call it META-N
from the city ??? They were down on the beach getting in the way of the soldiers and marines ...
My fav was the Scud Stud Arthur Someone from NBC or ABC ...
I just remembered Arthur reported from that hotel rooftop in the later war ...
it’s not complete until you see the test pattern being broadcast...
It’s news to me that Zucker and his mistress advised Gov. Cuomo- I thought it was just Chris. The behind-closed-doors discussions must have been interesting.
I expect they don’t know any actual people- only others in their insulated world. They are small people with diminishing power.
Dead Man Walking.
I would applaud John Malone if he were to turn CNN into a news and serious journalism outlet. It’s something that’s sorely needed and would likely send Fox running for the hills. This is the biggest hole in media today, and one I think most people would like to see filled…
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.