There is nothing more than what the words proclaim. It is your right to own and carry arms. If you want a Javelin missile on your truck, Constitutionally the only limit is on your ability to pay for one. There are no nuances, no alternate “interpretations.” If you need them then you are merely trying to ignore the Amendment. ALL legal restrictions on keeping and bearing arms of any sort are unConstitutional. All gun licenses and permits are unConstitutionl. If you want to take your meanings from post Constitutional legal history then you are chasing after legal elusions. Much hof the government as it exists is of questionable Constitutionality. Gun laws are absolutely unconstiutional.
“ALL legal restrictions on keeping and bearing arms of any sort are unConstitutional.”
Seems to me that your opinion is a law requiring one to give up a stolen gun in one’s possession to the true owner would be unconstitutional. After all, that would be a legal restriction “of any sort” and an infringement.
Seems to me that your opinion is a law saying parents can, absent a need for self defense, prohibit their five year old child from keeping and bearing arms would be unconstitutional. After all, that would be a legal restriction “of any sort” and an infringement of the child’s right.
You’re entitled to your opinions. You don’t even have to defend or justify them. But, could you?