“The right to own is not modified”...
...By the right to keep and bear arms.
The right to keep and bear arms does not cover someone keeping and bearing arms that were stolen from me.
Are we in agreement on that?
“It has no bearing whatever on the RIGHT to keep and bear”
The right to own bears on the right to keep and bear arms if the arms are stolen.
I’m not going into left field, I’m digging deeper.
I’m trying to discuss the meaning, scope, extent of the first clause.
The right to keep and bear arms does not deny your right to toothpaste either, or to troll a conservative site with fanciful irrelevant “arguments.”