Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge; SunkenCiv
"Makes ya wonder what they might dig up next."

Prolly the bones of Ninurta and Nergal who dropped the bombs.

Just read an interesting footnote on this in "The Wars of Gods and Men" (Sitchin).

Page 313:

* The traditional and literal translation of the Hebrew term Netsiv melah has been "pillar of salt," and tracts have been written in the Middle Ages explaining the process whereby a person could turn into crystalline salt. However, if--as we believe--the mother tongue of Abraham and Lot was Sumerian, and the event was first recorded not in a Semitic language, but in Sumerian, an entirely different and more plausible understanding of the fate of Lot's wife becomes possible.

In a paper presented to the American Oriental Society in 1918 and in a followup article in Beitrage zur Assyriologie, Paul Haupthad shown conclusively that because the early sources of salt in Sumer were swamps near the Persian Gulf, the Sumerian term NIMUR branched off to mean both salt and vapor. Because the Dead Sea has been called in Hebrew, The Salt Sea, the biblical narrator probably misinterpreted the Sumerian term and wrote "pillar of salt" when in fact Lot's wife became a "pillar of vapor."

In this connection it is notewortthy that in Ugaritic texts, such as the Canaanite tale of Aqhat (with its many similarities to the tales of Abraham) the death of a mortal by the hand of a god was described as the "escape of his soul as vapor, like smoke from his nostrils."

Indeed, in the Erra Epos which, we believe, was the Sumerian record of the nuclear upheaval, the death of the people was described by the god thus: 'The people I will make vanish, their souls shall turn to vapor.

It was the misfortune of Lot's wife to be among those who were "turned to vapor." [Sitchin]

11 posted on 05/11/2006 8:25:39 AM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Eastbound
However, if--as we believe--the mother tongue of Abraham and Lot was Sumerian, and the event was first recorded not in a Semitic language, but in Sumerian, an entirely different and more plausible understanding of the fate of Lot's wife becomes possible.
However, since the tongue of Abraham wasn't Sumerian...
12 posted on 05/11/2006 8:38:23 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson