Scanning electron microscope picture of a glass spherule brought back from the Moon by Apollo 11. The spherule is about 250 microns in diameter. Photo by Tim Culler/UC Berkeley
1 posted on
11/27/2006 10:11:40 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
To: 75thOVI; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; Berosus; CGVet58; chilepepper; ...
2 posted on
11/27/2006 10:12:16 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Thursday, November 16, 2006 https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
cambrian explosion site:freerepublic.com
Google
3 posted on
11/27/2006 10:13:30 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Thursday, November 16, 2006 https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: FairOpinion
...a nice, fresh, new catastrophism ping list topic, from 2000. ;')
4 posted on
11/27/2006 10:18:21 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Thursday, November 16, 2006 https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
5 posted on
11/27/2006 10:19:41 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Thursday, November 16, 2006 https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: DaveLoneRanger
6 posted on
11/27/2006 10:52:00 PM PST by
loboinok
(Gun control is hitting what you aim at!)
To: SunkenCiv
Neat! But I do not see any justification for this "assumption."
"Even though we dont know which crater was the source of each spherule, the distribution of the ages of the spherules from a single lunar site should reflect the age distribution of craters on the Moon," Muller said.
I would assume the single sample could come from an area "bombarded" at the measured peak age of the sample. I would be convinced if a sample gathered at the antipode displayed the same profile.
8 posted on
11/27/2006 11:12:12 PM PST by
AndrewC
(Duckpond, LLD, JSD (all honorary))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson