Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mining the moon for a nuclear future
cnn ^ | 12/18/06 | Dean Irvine

Posted on 12/20/2006 7:02:25 PM PST by KevinDavis

LONDON, England (CNN) -- The race to return to the moon is on. Earlier this month NASA unveiled its mission statement to revisit earth's satellite and create a permanent base there. While it may become the jumping off point for further exploration of our solar system and beyond, there are more earthly prizes in sight, with some scientists believing that it has the potential to solve the world's dependence on fossil fuels.

Mining the moon for fuel used in nuclear fusion reactors is among NASA's 200-plus set of mission goals and could precipitate another reason for other countries and private investors to join future lunar exploration.

The substance that has such large potential is an isotope called helium-3, a form of helium but with only one neutron instead of two.

(Excerpt) Read more at edition.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: fusion; he3; helium3; moon; space

1 posted on 12/20/2006 7:02:27 PM PST by KevinDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; ...

2 posted on 12/20/2006 7:02:46 PM PST by KevinDavis (Nancy you ignorant Slut!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

But what about lunar warming, and the effect on Moon Manitees?


3 posted on 12/20/2006 7:18:06 PM PST by TheTruthAintPretty (G-d Bless our brothers and sisters, sons and daughters, fathers and mothers in harm's way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

One thing I worry about: If we removed enough material to significantly alter the mass of the moon, could it affect the moon's orbit, and if so, what effects would that have on tides and things like that?


4 posted on 12/20/2006 8:20:42 PM PST by lesser_satan (EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan
One thing I worry about: If we removed enough material to significantly alter the mass of the moon

mass of the Moon = 7.36 × 10^22 kilograms

One percent = 7.36 x 10^20 kilograms = 8.11E17 TONS
The bulk density of the Moon is 3.4 g/cc
Estimated 1% of moon's material would be 2.16E23 cm^3.

OR roughly a ball of rock 744km across.

Honestly, I wouldn't worry about it too much for the time being.

5 posted on 12/20/2006 10:23:05 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Gov't: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Thanks for the post and ping, and here are some older topics:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=helium3


6 posted on 12/20/2006 10:35:52 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Don't bother, I haven't updated my profile since 11/16/06. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Returning to the moon in force to establish bases on the antarctic model is a worthy goal in and of itself, but if Helium 3 is your primary reason, CF/LENR has long demonstrated tritium(and thus He3 w/H3 halflife of 12.5 years)production quickly and cheaply. Do you dare look at the facts?


7 posted on 12/21/2006 1:18:19 AM PST by timer (n/0=n=nx0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

The He-3 myth continues to thrive and generate more energy than lunar He-3 ever will.


8 posted on 12/21/2006 8:33:47 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson