I just saw your analysis and link in a comment in response to Part V. You and swordmaker make valid points. I’m certainly hesitant to recommend his essays with the scientific issues pointed out and was considering asking that they be pulled.
However, with the above comments noted, they do provide a basis for discussion and I will make a link to your concerns in the other parts.
What Palmer and I are pointing out is that even if he is right in some things the failings of his other statements damage the value of those where he is right and causes those who recognize the errors to discount everything he says. It's sad... just a little effort on Google could have made this much better.
It does give a starting point for discussion.