 |
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
|
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
Gee, what are the odds that a backwoods caveman would have eating utensil artifacts which were over 1500 years old from his age, in his possession and using them in his same abode when he was frozen for another 3000 years?
..and to think we only have ‘antiques’ that are 20-200 years old in our proximity, and generally not as closer guarded as this poor fellow must have regarded them. IMHO 1500 years is quite a long time for a family to keep a bowl around.
Maybe the dating methods reveal more about their theories than any evidence they have found.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,357366,00.html
A New Alpine Melt Theory
By Hilmar Schmundt
The Alpine glaciers are shrinking, that much we know. But new research suggests that in the time of the Roman Empire, they were smaller than today. And 7,000 years ago they probably weren’t around at all. A group of climatologists have come up with a controversial new theory on how the Alps must have looked over the ages...
article dated May, 2005.