Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: count-your-change

Well there is a lot of new and contradictory research out there on the topic/s. The science is in a state of flux.

Your rebuttal’s are theories also.

I did not want to deluge the thread with multiple articles.

But thanks for reading the article and giving your insight/opinions.

Regards,


15 posted on 08/29/2008 1:46:46 PM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: valkyry1
There are theories and there are theories and not all are of equal value. I could theorize that the moon is made of green cheese but so what? and the article has a theory/theories that is just as unlikely as the cheese.
This from the article I did read:

“In addition, there is now growing evidence from the field of heliosiesmology that the sun possesses a significant stratification layer at a very shallow depth from the top of the photosphere. This new data suggest that the stratified iron surface is covered by a relatively thin veneer of plasma layers.
It is also noteworthy that an electrically active, rigid surface model of the sun has always been a valid alternative to the current gas model theory.”

Does any of that new and contradictory research posit a solid surface for the sun as a valid alternative to anything?

16 posted on 08/29/2008 2:16:27 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson