Well there is a lot of new and contradictory research out there on the topic/s. The science is in a state of flux.
Your rebuttal’s are theories also.
I did not want to deluge the thread with multiple articles.
But thanks for reading the article and giving your insight/opinions.
Regards,
“In addition, there is now growing evidence from the field of heliosiesmology that the sun possesses a significant stratification layer at a very shallow depth from the top of the photosphere. This new data suggest that the stratified iron surface is covered by a relatively thin veneer of plasma layers.
It is also noteworthy that an electrically active, rigid surface model of the sun has always been a valid alternative to the current gas model theory.”
Does any of that new and contradictory research posit a solid surface for the sun as a valid alternative to anything?