So by studying fire patterns SINCE the supposed event, he has been able to prove that the event never occurred?
What am I missing here?
Maybe fire patterns increased because IT TOOK A WHILE FOR IT TO ALL GROW BACK?
I hate these guys who say something is set in stone, a better title would be something like “Evidence found against ancient comet theory”, but I guess if he goes to parties, he gets more babes if he says “I disproved something...”
Unless I missed it, they haven't 'disproved' the theory that a comet struck the U.S. at about 12,000 years ago, but only that it didn't (so they say) lead to continent sized wild fires.
You are braver than me. I wonder if ole Moses is laughing as much as me. LOL