Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

Yes. Yes it is. Now we are sterile.


2 posted on 05/04/2009 1:59:48 PM PDT by BlueStateBlues (Blue State for business, Red State at heart.........Palin 2012--can't come soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BlueStateBlues
Yes. Yes it is. Now we are sterile.

Not sterile, just stupid. At least 52% of us have been affected.

6 posted on 05/04/2009 2:07:22 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BlueStateBlues; Pearls Before Swine; LibWhacker; SunkenCiv
Now we are sterile.

Actually...

How Low Can You Go

Snip

There have been a number of studies over the past 15-20 years (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 10), which suggest that sperm counts in man are on the decline. Since these changes are recent and appear to have occurred internationally, it has been presumed that they reflect adverse effects of environmental or lifestyle factors on the male rather than, for example, genetic changes in susceptibility. If the decrease in sperm counts were to continue at the rate that it is then in a few years we will witness widespread male infertility. To date it remains unknown why this is happening and the available preventative measures, which can be taken to avoid a continuation of this trend, are not common knowledge.

15 posted on 05/04/2009 5:45:29 PM PDT by bigheadfred (Negromancer !!! RUN for your lives !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson