Skip to comments.
THE SUN IS STIRRING
Space Weather ^
| Unknown
Posted on 05/07/2009 7:44:06 AM PDT by decimon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: The Electrician
Or a little bit of DX... Back in the army that meant being scrapped. I'm not quite ready for that.
21
posted on
05/07/2009 8:04:38 AM PDT
by
decimon
To: HighlyOpinionated
Where do you live with this Peony?New York. Low winter sun.
22
posted on
05/07/2009 8:06:14 AM PDT
by
decimon
To: decimon
impressive coronal mass ejectionThat, um, sounds a little lewd.
23
posted on
05/07/2009 8:06:54 AM PDT
by
OB1kNOb
(I'm all for cap & trade. I want to cap government's power and trade it for a conservative one.)
To: mplsconservative
Peonies usually dont bloom until the second or third year after being transplanted. The need to re-establish their root system before theyre able to bloom.Thanks. That makes sense.
24
posted on
05/07/2009 8:08:07 AM PDT
by
decimon
To: decimon
Awww, the Sun is having a baby!
25
posted on
05/07/2009 8:08:10 AM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
(Obamanation: an imploding administration headed by a clueless schmuck, with McCain as his Kowakian)
To: OB1kNOb
impressive coronal mass ejection That, um, sounds a little lewd.
Hot and bothered, yes.
26
posted on
05/07/2009 8:09:20 AM PDT
by
decimon
To: decimon
Was that coronal mass ejection good for you?
27
posted on
05/07/2009 8:11:25 AM PDT
by
ZeitgeistSurfer
(Caution, Obama Zombies Ahead!)
To: decimon
The Sun is a Variable Star!!!!!!!!
We’re all gonna die!!!!!
(What do you mean it has been doing this for as long as the earth has been here? Don’t cloud the issue with facts man!)
28
posted on
05/07/2009 8:13:14 AM PDT
by
Conan the Librarian
(The Best in Life is to crush my enemies, see them driven before me, and the Dewey Decimal System)
To: wombtotomb
The war on bugs has unintended consequences.
29
posted on
05/07/2009 8:16:11 AM PDT
by
Colvin
(Harry Reid is a sap sucking idiot.)
To: ZeitgeistSurfer
Was that coronal mass ejection good for you?
30
posted on
05/07/2009 8:19:44 AM PDT
by
ZX12R
To: ZeitgeistSurfer
Was that coronal mass ejection good for you?On the far side of the moon.
31
posted on
05/07/2009 8:19:48 AM PDT
by
decimon
To: decimon
The globalist warmers are peeing their panties from excitement. I hope it is just a hiccup. Nothing will prove the warming demagogues wrong faster than an extended solar minimum.
32
posted on
05/07/2009 8:28:02 AM PDT
by
pallis
To: pallis
Nothing will prove the warming demagogues wrong faster than an extended solar minimum.That would also cause more energy used. Higher prices with the proceeds going to the bad guys.
33
posted on
05/07/2009 8:33:46 AM PDT
by
decimon
To: decimon
“...The Sun has suburbs? Must be tough to keep a green lawn. ;-)...”
Just based on the pic, the Sun IS green. Must be all those lush lawns.
34
posted on
05/07/2009 8:34:26 AM PDT
by
NCC-1701
(ON 1-19-09 GAS WAS, ON AVERAGE IN MEMPHIS, $1.43 A GALLON.)
To: decimon
The local congregation of Global Warmists is having a prayer meeting to thank Gaya for the eruption. Then they will have a sermon Saturday to deny the sun's influence on temperatures.
35
posted on
05/07/2009 8:40:18 AM PDT
by
norwaypinesavage
(Global Warming Theory is extremely robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it)
To: decimon
Sunspot or not, the Sun remains in a minimum for now, since the last spot before this was the previous cycle. Once there are several new-cycle sunspot groups (each with individual spots) present at the same time, I’d say we’re definitely on our way towards maximum. That is, of course, unless we’re headed into uncharted territory (for modern astronomy) with another Maunder Minimum type event.
Another interesting data point is that lately sunspots have been dying out after a day or two. So, even if this was a sunspot on the other side, it may never appear on this side, or be included in the “official” count.
To: PreciousLiberty
I don’t know what this means, if anything. But it will be, IMO, a good sign if there are more spots.
37
posted on
05/07/2009 8:47:10 AM PDT
by
decimon
To: decimon
Well...I like the current global cooling trend since it so directly contradicts the global warming nonsense. Of course, the Sun will do what the Sun will do. Last year we had 73% spotless days, so far this year we’re at 86%, and last year was a 100-year level event...
There is some evidence that independent of the sunspot cycles, sunspots may become invisible (the core temperature has been rising over the last few decades) by 2015. This is not understood, but is a plausible explanation for Maunder Minimum type events.
Interesting times, to say the least.
To: decimon
“That would also cause more energy used. Higher prices with the proceeds going to the bad guys.”
A long solar minimum couldn’t possibly cost us more, or put more money into the pockets of bad guys than global warming policies.
39
posted on
05/07/2009 9:13:57 AM PDT
by
pallis
To: decimon
It’s just a skittle crapping sky unicorn coming to America and summonned by Obama the fruitcake.
40
posted on
05/07/2009 9:14:08 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(We either Free America ourselves, or it is midnight for humanity for a thousand years.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson