Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/16/2009 9:29:47 AM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

‘If Ryskin is right, then climate change, predicted to alter the strength and course of ocean currents, could also alter the planet’s magnetic field. ‘

Catastrophe or hollow earth ping.


2 posted on 06/16/2009 9:30:32 AM PDT by BGHater (Insanity is voting for Republicans and expecting Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

Interesting theory.

Seems a bit too easy to test, however, for someone not to have discovered it before.


3 posted on 06/16/2009 9:46:48 AM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater
An intriguing thought to say the least.

Although perhaps not the core mechanism, a bunch of free ions swarming across magnetic lines are going to alter or create fields otherwise not extant.

Good to see the idea coming out of the US. We're losing it fast - all lawyers, no science. Kind of like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Charles Schumer, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, Rahm Emmanuel, etc. etc. etc.

4 posted on 06/16/2009 9:53:13 AM PDT by jnsun (The LEFT: The need to manipulate others because of nothing productive to offer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater
The magnetic field protects us from radiation;the ocean currents control the magnetic field; global warming is killing the ocean currents; man is causing global warming; therefore, we are killing ourselves.

Expect this to be the newest battlefront with the global warming nutjobs.

5 posted on 06/16/2009 9:58:25 AM PDT by oldvike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

I metal detect and the movement of salt water definitively generates electric fields. It affects the fields put out by metal detectors enough that you have to have a certain type or at least have the right settings. It makes sense. There’s an awful lot of sea.


12 posted on 06/16/2009 10:57:06 AM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater
If I recall correctly, Mercury also has a magnetic field and not a heck of a lot of oceans.

Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune all have magnetic fields too, but are all gas giants and not really comparable.

18 posted on 06/16/2009 12:13:01 PM PDT by kennedy (I'm a Kennedy with no experience or qualifications too! Where do I sign up for MY Senate seat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; ...

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Thanks BGHater.
Earth's magnetic field, long thought to be generated by molten metals swirling around its core, may instead be produced by ocean currents, according to controversial new research published this week. It suggests that the movements of such volumes of salt water around the world have been seriously underestimated by scientists as a source of magnetism.
To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


20 posted on 06/16/2009 2:07:13 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

The Internal Temperatures and Magnetic Fields of The Planets (Professor Seligman)

22 posted on 06/16/2009 2:12:16 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater; SunkenCiv

Does it have to be either/or, or can it be “YES!” to both?

Wouldn’t be that surprised to see the ocean scenario as a contributing player.

Should have seen the “erosion” readings I got from a slurry sample decades ago.

I used a probe in a water/ore-particle slurry that was connected such that the hesitance of the probe was monitored, with the resistance change as the probe wore away being used to calculate the projected erosion of pipeline to carry the slurry from an iron mine to the mill. Problem was, the slurry was rotated past the probe in the vessel, and it contained magnetite.

Rotating magnetic particles and a steel probe = generator! The engineers I was working for had to design a new test method.

This could be a somewhat analogous macro-situation.


23 posted on 06/16/2009 3:02:10 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The mob got President Barabbas; America got shafted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater
That would explain why so many people are drawn to the ocean...


32 posted on 06/17/2009 8:24:24 AM PDT by Hegemony Cricket (The emperor has no pedigree.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson