Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Elderberry
True, and I miscalculated the ratio of iron to water (which is 5% of the crust, not of the whole volume). However, the magnetic effects of the iron in the crust would seem to dwarf the effect of seawater, wouldn't it?

According to link from other post in this thread, the earth's crust is 20 mi thick on average under the continents and 3 mi thick on average under the oceans. Using the 71% ocean ratio, we get the average thickness of the crust is 7.93 miles; applying our formula for volumes, the volume of the crust would be:

Volume crust = 4/3 * pi * (r1^3 - r2^3)

= 4/3 * pi * (3963^3 - 3955.07^3)

= 4/3 * pi * (62240377347 - 61867493758)

= 4/3 * pi * 372883589

= 1,561,931,148 cu miles

From earlier post, volume of ocean = 378,080,439 cu miles

Ratio of solid crust to ocean = roughly 4/1 (earth's crust is approximately 80% solid and 20% water)

If 5% of crust = Fe, then there is 4% iron in crust compared to 20% water (5:1 ratio); ignoring the negligible amount of iron dissolved in seawater (< 10^-9 moles/kg), I still think the magnetic properties of the iron would have far greater effect on earth's magnetic field than the electrolytic/conductive properties of sea water - what are your thoughts?

15 posted on 06/16/2009 11:23:17 AM PDT by bt_dooftlook (John Adams: Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: bt_dooftlook

I don’t believe that the solid crust contributes to the creation of the magnetic field. I think it’s creation is due to the motion of the molten conductive iron in the liquid portion of the Earth’s core.


17 posted on 06/16/2009 11:33:38 AM PDT by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson