Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
'Modern humans brought illnesses they could survive themselves, but for Neanderthals they were deadly,' Sørensen said.

Then what kept neanderthal diseases from wiping US out??

7 posted on 07/08/2009 6:31:51 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wendy1946

See my post in message #1. :’)


10 posted on 07/08/2009 6:52:50 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: wendy1946
It's probably by chance that the diseases Neanderthals had grown immune to were less deadly that the ones our ancestors had evolved to live with. Something similar happened in the Conquest of Mexico: Europeans had a higher degree of tolerance to Smallpox than did the native Mexicans, but no disease native to Mexico affected the Spanish as badly.

But, again, looking at the effect of European diseases on the New World, while they decimated populations to the point that native cultures were unsustainable, they did not exterminate them. A small number of people possessed natural immunity, just a a small number of Europeans had some type of immunity to the Black Death. I do not see an historical precedent to a disease wiping out an entire race; always some few survive, and later flourish.

13 posted on 07/08/2009 8:25:34 PM PDT by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson