[count-your-change]

“...even the most cautious opinion holds that 500 million subsequent years of opportunity have not expanded the Cambrian range, achieved in just five million years. The Cambrian explosion was the most remarkable and puzzling event in the history of life.”
(Steven Gould, The Richness of Life, pg. 217)

The Cambrian explosion becomes even more of a refutation of Darwinism as time goes on and eventually either Darwin will have to tossed overboard or Darwinism so modified as to not be recognizable as such.

Either way Darwin is being dismantled.

[Buck W.]

“...either Darwin will have to tossed overboard or Darwinism so modified as to not be recognizable as such.”

Are you so brainwashed as to believe that such a result would be a bad thing for science? Although certainly not for the inane reasons presented in this creation rationalization comic book, if credible evidence is presented that refutes evolution, another theory will take its place. Science, you see, is falsifiable. That’s a necessary feature of scientific inquiry.

Is creation rationalization falsifiable?