To: Nikas777
Interesting article, but it begs one enormous question: Nowhere in the article does it mention radioactivity - certainly even thousands of years later, there should be some residue detectable by Geiger counter.
11 posted on
10/06/2009 7:32:34 AM PDT by
mkleesma
(`Call to me, and I will answer you and tell you great and unsearchable things you do not know.')
To: mkleesma
Anti-matter bombs rather than A-bombs?
16 posted on
10/06/2009 7:42:23 AM PDT by
Nikas777
(En touto nika, "In this, be victorious")
To: mkleesma
Advanced atomic weapons should have a tremendous yield in heat energy and a tiny yield in what we term radioactivity.
That is, they would have to be tuned better than we can do today.
19 posted on
10/06/2009 7:47:12 AM PDT by
muawiyah
(qui)
To: mkleesma
Exactly. im wondering if there is a non-tinfoil article on this stuff
91 posted on
10/06/2009 7:42:32 PM PDT by
wafflehouse
(RE-ELECT NO ONE !)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson