Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Nikas777

Interesting article, but it begs one enormous question: Nowhere in the article does it mention radioactivity - certainly even thousands of years later, there should be some residue detectable by Geiger counter.


11 posted on 10/06/2009 7:32:34 AM PDT by mkleesma (`Call to me, and I will answer you and tell you great and unsearchable things you do not know.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mkleesma

Anti-matter bombs rather than A-bombs?


16 posted on 10/06/2009 7:42:23 AM PDT by Nikas777 (En touto nika, "In this, be victorious")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: mkleesma
Advanced atomic weapons should have a tremendous yield in heat energy and a tiny yield in what we term radioactivity.

That is, they would have to be tuned better than we can do today.

19 posted on 10/06/2009 7:47:12 AM PDT by muawiyah (qui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: mkleesma

Exactly. im wondering if there is a non-tinfoil article on this stuff


91 posted on 10/06/2009 7:42:32 PM PDT by wafflehouse (RE-ELECT NO ONE !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson