Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: decimon

This article just confuses me. If I would have wrote it, I would have put my name as unknown, too.


3 posted on 11/05/2009 11:30:35 AM PST by bigheadfred (Anybody seen my whetstone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: bigheadfred
This article just confuses me. If I would have wrote it, I would have put my name as unknown, too.

I think I see your problem... In very simple terms: You add from below and take away at the top. Get it?

7 posted on 11/05/2009 12:21:54 PM PST by Moltke (DOPE will get you 4 to 8 in the Big House - HOPE will get you 4 to 8 in the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: bigheadfred

There’s two forces at work here.

Erosion, the wearing-down of mountains, is easily understood. Mountains start eroding the minute they are formed.

The uplift is due to “glacial rebound”, though it wasn’t explained too well in this article. In brief, all the former glaciers that sat on the Alps weighed them down; now that they are melting (and thus weigh less), the ground is “springing back” (albeit very slowly), like a chair that has been sat in awhile.

A similar situation occurs today in Hudson’s Bay, which is still rebounding from the last Ice Age (about 20,000 years ago).

BTW, this process also really complicates figuring out where ancient sea-levels were.

More: http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glacial_rebound


8 posted on 11/05/2009 12:33:13 PM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson