To: bruinbirdman
Do elves do the work? Are black holes unionized? Inspiring minds want to know.
2 posted on
11/30/2009 7:24:27 PM PST by
TigersEye
(Sarah Palin 2010 - We Can't Afford To Wait)
To: bruinbirdman
Black holes are cosmic factories for building galaxies
4 posted on
11/30/2009 7:28:44 PM PST by
Jagdgewehr
(The GOP faithful want me to believe I have only two voting options......"bad" and "worse")
To: bruinbirdman
6 posted on
11/30/2009 7:35:44 PM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
To: bruinbirdman
When you consider the energies and vast distances involved it sure makes our problems here look mighty puny by comparison.
Behold his mighty hand...
7 posted on
11/30/2009 7:35:54 PM PST by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts....)
To: bruinbirdman
"creating new stars at a frantic rate equivalent to about 350 suns per year"
oh my.... merely trying to imagine such a galaxy-creation process is exhausting.... the energy and mass(es) involved must be stupendous.... well at least "astronomical" in the equations and calculations.
8 posted on
11/30/2009 7:41:51 PM PST by
Enchante
(Obama to Jihad Terrorists: Come to NYC and Propagate Your Message - I Am Only Too Happy To Help You)
To: bruinbirdman
Sounds like BS to me. A black hole sweeps up much more matter than whatever matter/energy might be ejected from its accretion disk. Black holes eventually dismantle the galaxies in which they reside. We are circling the drain right now, but it will take a long time to get there. A naked black hole can only assemble a galaxy to reside in by attracting and concentrating matter in its neighborhood.
9 posted on
11/30/2009 8:07:36 PM PST by
Stirner
To: bruinbirdman
10 posted on
11/30/2009 8:10:09 PM PST by
x_plus_one
(Those who cannot remember the past, are condemned to have George Santayana quoted at them forever)
To: bruinbirdman
However, there was a companion galaxy close to it creating new stars at a frantic rate equivalent to about 350 suns per year.So what you are basically saying is, the time needed for a galaxy to be formed is highly variable and contingent on the activity of many unknown and little-understood phenomena. You'll pardon me, then, if I find a galaxy forming in 24-hours hypothetically possible, given this disclosure.
To: bruinbirdman
Excuse me?!?
To: bruinbirdman
19 posted on
11/30/2009 9:21:14 PM PST by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: bruinbirdman
In the absence of indications of other galaxy-less black holes constructing their new caccoon, this seems more of a one-of.
Mightn’t this instead be a black hole that was at some time in the far past in the center of a conventional galaxy that collided with a second galaxy, and rather then the two black holes merging, this one by chance is ejected to its “current” observed position.
20 posted on
12/01/2009 5:06:24 AM PST by
tlb
To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
21 posted on
12/01/2009 6:53:30 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: KevinDavis; annie laurie; garbageseeker; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
23 posted on
12/01/2009 7:09:55 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: bruinbirdman; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...
24 posted on
12/01/2009 7:12:15 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: bruinbirdman
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
