[decimon]

Sensitivity training ping.

[hennie pennie]

Is this a ‘humor’ article?

[Chi-townChief]

Hmmm ... sounds like the kids in Bristol are no longer sharp as a crystal.

[Gaffer]

Bwaaaaaahaaaahaaaaahaaaaaaa!......These people are reallllly naive.....now, the earth is hypersensitive to C02!!!!! Ooooooohhhhhhhhhh, boooooga boooooga!!!!!!!!!

A word to the wise, please don't click on any links. Mostly likely they have a hit counter racking up the hits to support a bullshit 'scientist consensus' tally. Jeeshh!!!!!

[MNJohnnie]

The Earth's temperature may be 30-50 percent more sensitive to atmospheric carbon dioxide than has previously been estimated, reports a new study published in Nature Geoscience this week

Only problem is the study is based on fraudulent data. It is a situation of putting garbage in so we get garbage out.

[ReleaseTheHounds]

They used to call it “GIGO”.

[Islam=Murder]

The MSM won’t report ClimateGate, so we have to.

Tell everybody you know - BEST ClimateGate clips:

http://BraveNewCommie.com

[DesScorp]

So Global Warming is being revealed as a scam. The numbers don't add up. The answer? Make the numbers work. So now, ah, CO2 is even worse than we thought for the atmosphere!

[EGPWS]

In the long term, the Earth's temperature may be 30-50% more sensitive to atmospheric carbon dioxide than has previously been estimated, reports a new study published in Nature Geoscience this week.

My God!

We are killing ourselves 30-50% more than we originally thought!

Where's my wallet, we need to stop this bullet train! ROTFLMAO!

[CivilWarguy]

Put another way: Previous studies, made by the same people, are a bunch of hooey.

But we can trust this study!

[Blood of Tyrants]

WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE .... unless the United States is destroyed and becomes a turd world country.

What they DON’T say is that the CO2 concentrations FOLLOW the temperature changes and doesn’t CAUSE the changes.

[pnh102]

LOL... more charlatans at work.

[Psycho_Bunny]

"This led us to review what was missing from the model."

Oh!. Pick Me!!! I know: Your intelligence and credibility.

[MNJohnnie]

Lunt said, "We found that, given the concentrations of carbon dioxide prevailing three million years ago, the model originally predicted a significantly smaller temperature increase than that indicated by the reconstructions. This led us to review what was missing from the model."

Complete BS.

He has no way to know the prevailing concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere 3 million years ago. No way to know how much volcanic activity was effecting the climate. No way to know the sunspot cycle.

This is just more political propaganda pretending to be "Science".

[bigbob]

Since most people are sick of reading about this crap, here’s the money quote:

“The results show that components of the Earth’s climate system that vary over long timescales – such as land-ice and vegetation – have an important effect on this temperature sensitivity, but these factors are often neglected in current climate models.”

Note the last sentence. 18,000 years ago the spot where I’m sitting would have been covered with ice. The polar bears are going to be just fine.

[Logical me]

When is this BS going to stop?

[pallis]

bullgore!

[Huskrrrr]

[FlingWingFlyer]

Government grants are going to get harder and harder to obtain. Desperation is setting in. If you want a grant, you better be preaching what the ‘RAT politicians want to hear.

[The Comedian]

The Earth's temperature may be 30-50 percent more sensitive to atmospheric carbon dioxide

But it probably isn't. In fact, I'll bet money that the physics of CO2 haven't changed in the last 100, 1000, or 1,000,000 years.

The shrill screach of the idiot Warmists is becomming deafening as we encircle them with their own noose...

Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.