I bet the Bimini Road is part of it, I was watching a documentary on this last weekend and it seemed plausible.
ping for later
I never watch MSNBC and just confirmed why.
Does this putz think he is funny or witty or what? He is none of the above.
What age group does this kind of TV appeal to 9 to 13 year olds?
ping for later
A coupla years ago, I recall that a team (French?) published photos taken less than a hundred miles west of Cuba at a depth of half a mile or so, which showed similar indications of huge ancient artifacts. But these were nearly buried under shifting sands.
The shots in this video are described by the announcer as “satellite photos.” If he’s right, these ain’t under deep waters and therefore should have been spotted from aircraft by now.
If he’s just mistaken and these ARE new underwater shots, the artifacts’ high degree of orthogonality and huge spread are certainly remarkable. However, their freedom from obscuring sedimentary deposits suggest that the photos are fakes or that the artifacts are situated in fairly shallow waters.
So again, if we’re talking shallow waters, I wonder why something this remarkable hasn’t been spotted before? If real, they are even more remarkable than the underwater forms at Yonaguni.
Might be something to this, or not. Have always believed there are probably several undiscovered, ancient civilizations which we know nothing about. Would be fascinating if one were actually discovered and explored.
These are the cities that went under when the sea level rose due to AGW. Atlantean Global Warming.
*ping*
*ping*
I thrilled that they finally came around to mentioning this news that came out about eight years ago. Can’t sneak anything past them.
wow
 |
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
related:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2190099/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2190254/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2193662/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2252405/posts