Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

Hard to imagine this setup is long-term stable (long-term in astronomical terms, of course). I wonder how long before the orbit decays and the stars merge with a supernova bang?


7 posted on 03/14/2010 5:37:56 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dayglored
Hard to imagine this setup is long-term stable

True. It is bound to become a Type Ia supernova. Because of its rapid rotation, it can exceed the Chandrasekhar limit for a while, but not for long.

If the distance to this pair can be established by parallax, it would be a nice calibration point for this standard candle.

11 posted on 03/14/2010 6:34:51 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

Apparently they are approximately equal in mass — and maybe the children of the same original star that went kablooey. But regardless, this is a terminal relationship they’re in.


13 posted on 03/14/2010 6:48:07 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (http://themagicnegro.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson