Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ETL
Here's a little spice for the differences in time.

Which observer is correct in his definition of time?

Neither? Both? or both Neither and both?

8 posted on 04/12/2010 9:03:48 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Jeremiah 50:31 Behold, I am against you," O " you most proud, said the said the Lord GOD of hosts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: rawcatslyentist
Here's a little spice for the differences in time.
Which observer is correct in his definition of time?
Neither? Both?

If the relative velocity between the two frames is constant (i.e., inertial), then the effects are reciprocal and BOTH correctly see the other's clock ticking out time more slowly than their own. However, if a force is involved and one of the frames is accelerating (i.e., changing its rate of speed OR direction), then the effects become real. It takes energy to move ahead in time. Velocity and therefore acceleration are 2-component vectors containing both speed AND direction. Change either the magnitude of the speed or the direction and the frame accelerates.

13 posted on 04/12/2010 9:22:43 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson