Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Earth and moon formed later than previously thought
University of Copenhagen ^ | Jun 7, 2010 | Unknown

Posted on 06/07/2010 5:29:41 PM PDT by decimon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

1 posted on 06/07/2010 5:29:41 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Better late than never ping.


2 posted on 06/07/2010 5:30:27 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Does this mean all the fairy tales I learned in college were wrong?

ML/NJ

3 posted on 06/07/2010 5:32:20 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

It’s easy to change details on “science” that is entirely made up!


4 posted on 06/07/2010 5:32:33 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: decimon

“The Earth and moon formed later than previously thought”

Oh nooez! That completely discounts all of TToE, since the Earth is only 6,000 years old and this proves so-called “science” is just guesswork!

(/Creationist)


5 posted on 06/07/2010 5:32:45 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who accepts a ride from a scorpion should expect a sting and the phrase "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

They came in earlier than I predicted, but come in they did.


6 posted on 06/07/2010 5:35:06 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who accepts a ride from a scorpion should expect a sting and the phrase "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Considering that none of this is provable, it’s not science.


7 posted on 06/07/2010 5:35:37 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

P.S. I don’t believe that the earth is only 6,000 years old. Man, however, may very well be.


8 posted on 06/07/2010 5:36:38 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235

>>Considering that none of this is provable, it’s not science.<<

Then you don’t know what science is.


9 posted on 06/07/2010 5:38:05 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who accepts a ride from a scorpion should expect a sting and the phrase "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
Thanks decimon!
The Earth and Moon were created as the result of a giant collision between two planets the size of Mars and Venus... Hafnium-182 is a radioactive substance, which decays and is converted into the isotope tungsten-182... It takes 50-60 million years for all hafnium to decay and be converted into tungsten, and during the Moon forming collision nearly all the metal sank into the Earth's core... the moon forming collision occurred after all of the hafnium had decayed completely into tungsten. "Our results show that metal core and rock are unable to emulsify in these collisions between planets that are greater than 10 kilometres in diameter and therefore that most of the Earth's iron core (80-99 %) did not remove tungsten from the rocky material in the mantle during formation", explains Tais W. Dahl.
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
 

10 posted on 06/07/2010 5:38:37 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Oh nooez! That completely discounts all of TToE, since the Earth is only 6,000 years old and this proves so-called “science” is just guesswork!

(/Creationist)


Well, one third of your screen name is apropos.
11 posted on 06/07/2010 5:39:48 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235

>>P.S. I don’t believe that the earth is only 6,000 years old. Man, however, may very well be.<<

There are very specific remnants showing Man to reach back to millions of years.

And, assuming you don’t understand TToE, there are artifacts of modern man that date to 8,000 years ago.


12 posted on 06/07/2010 5:40:10 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who accepts a ride from a scorpion should expect a sting and the phrase "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: decimon; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 240B; 24Karet; ...

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Thanks decimon.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · LiveScience · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


13 posted on 06/07/2010 5:40:16 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
The Earth and Moon were created as the result of a giant collision between two planets the size of Mars and Venus.

I mourn their loss.

(sniffle...)

14 posted on 06/07/2010 5:40:21 PM PDT by SIDENET ("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235
Considering that none of this is provable, it’s not science.

Damn, another freeper figures it out....

15 posted on 06/07/2010 5:40:52 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Somebody who’s really dumb, isn’t really free...


16 posted on 06/07/2010 5:41:40 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
Damn, another freeper figures it out....

Sophistries of "proof" have been around for a long, long time.

17 posted on 06/07/2010 5:42:58 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

>>Well, one third of your screen name is apropos.<<

yes, being “free” of Luddite-dogma is quite apropos.

But thanks for proving my point.


18 posted on 06/07/2010 5:43:00 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who accepts a ride from a scorpion should expect a sting and the phrase "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Computer models of extremely complex processes. I shudder.


19 posted on 06/07/2010 5:44:10 PM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

>>Damn, another freeper figures it out....<<

Damn, another Freeper doesn’t understand science. That seems to be qite a popular stance these days.


20 posted on 06/07/2010 5:44:15 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who accepts a ride from a scorpion should expect a sting and the phrase "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson