To: steelyourfaith; NormsRevenge; Fred Nerks; blam; SunkenCiv; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; BOBTHENAILER; ..
Another meat filled article.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I have been saying for years, warmer temps lead to increased growth of vegetation and increased sustenance for critters as well as humans.
Thats a lot more CO2.
Temp leads C02 therefore CO2 is a function of temp, not the converse.
4 posted on
06/09/2010 6:57:13 PM PDT by
mylife
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks again Ernest. I bookmarked WUWT link. Then read through the featured article.
What bugs me is the criminals across the globe that still want to in any way tax, punish industries for in some way exhuasing CO2 within their industrial processes etc., continue to not be barned stormed out of the arena and then at minimum, tarred and feathered.
5 posted on
06/09/2010 7:13:40 PM PDT by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned....)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Thunder90; Dr. Bogus Pachysandra; Entrepreneur; Darnright; Nipfan; ...
9 posted on
06/09/2010 7:55:54 PM PDT by
steelyourfaith
(America should take a mulligan on the 2008 presidential election.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; ...
Thanks Ernest_at_the_Beach. This was found to be the case in study of ice cores from Antarctica done back in the 1990s. Glaciers melted, the stuff that had been covered and frozen rotted, and various other biological activity increased -- and with it, the CO2 level.
11 posted on
06/10/2010 6:25:36 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson