Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: steelyourfaith; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; SunkenCiv
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Wow...They had co2 back then....I thought we modern, anti nature folks invented it.
3 posted on
07/10/2010 1:57:42 PM PDT by
Sacajaweau
(What)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
4 posted on
07/10/2010 1:57:50 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(The Last Boy Scout)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
They're STILL trying this crap?
Time to take back the Universities and sentence most of the "scientists" and self-proclaimed "thought leaders" to penal servitude.
And yes, you wankers -- I said "penal" not "penile" so don't get your hopes up.
Cheers!
5 posted on
07/10/2010 2:04:52 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Scientwists, they don’t give up!
Government funding keeps the heat on.
Yo scientwists! We are heated by Sun and are on the mercy of sunspot cycles and human “contribution” is as much as peeing in the ocean and trying to cause global flooood!
6 posted on
07/10/2010 2:05:12 PM PDT by
Leo Carpathian
(fffffFRrrreeeeepppeeee-ssed!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Such staggering extrapolation. It reminds me of the slightly gross, but funny segment on ‘Robot Chicken’, called, “If you give a mouse a cookie”.
http://video.adultswim.com/robot-chicken/give-a-mouse-a-cookie.html
There is actually an important concept in there, of using ridiculous extrapolations to justify terrible acts. Like using MMGW to justify political and economic control over the world.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
If we’re wondering where we can cut spending, I’m guessing 2/3 of all research grants are useless politically driven ventures like this.
8 posted on
07/10/2010 2:10:54 PM PDT by
lurk
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Obviously methane gas from dinosaurs was a major contributor to global warming back then.
9 posted on
07/10/2010 2:14:14 PM PDT by
Huskrrrr
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Every time one of these people makes a case they list 1, 2, 3 and forget or miss 4 and 5. The One or two parts they miss blows their argument out of the water.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
so what?
last time i looked wasnt the arctic too cold for anything anyway?
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
So it was 19’ WARMER a gajillion years ago before G.W Bush’s CO2 warming even existed.
13 posted on
07/10/2010 2:19:07 PM PDT by
omega4179
(www.jdforsenate.com)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
My computer model says that if my atic gets warmer it probably won't be so cold there. I guarantee it!
O.k., where my grant check?
16 posted on
07/10/2010 2:42:53 PM PDT by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Remember that CU is in Boulder which is said to be the most liberal city in the US and is said to still be the Drug capitol of the US. CU is where the guy invented the hockey stick curve for world temperature form three trees in Siberia. Lets wait for sober peer review.
17 posted on
07/10/2010 2:47:44 PM PDT by
mountainlion
(concerned conservative.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Sounds to me like someone’s trolling for one of those huge grants from a liberal trust fund like Mellon or Pew.
All this talk about peat has given me a yen for a little single malt.
18 posted on
07/10/2010 2:48:34 PM PDT by
Mobties
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"At that time, CO2 levels are thought to have been close to current levels around 390 parts per million but global temperatures were around 2 to 3 °C warmer than today. It was the last warm period before the onset of the Pleistocene glaciation, and is used by climate researchers as a model for our future climate."
The Pliocene Epoch is part of the Cenozoic Era.
19 posted on
07/10/2010 3:00:56 PM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Look at more recent climate history. About 20,000 years ago much of the northern hemisphere was covered in hundreds of feet of glaciers. Obviously this ice age was brought on by massive global cooling. However these glaciers melted so there must have been massive global warming. All of this happened in a few thousand years and had nothing to do with CO2 levels. So let’s see some explanation for this recent climate change, not some 4 million year old period.
20 posted on
07/10/2010 3:06:33 PM PDT by
The Great RJ
(The Bill of Rights: Another bill members of Congress haven't read.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"These results should be alarming," says Ballantyne. Although it could take centuries for current global temperatures to respond to rising CO2 levels,...It will take more than centuries. It will take a suspension of the laws of physics. It would be the first time that rising CO2 levels preceded a rise in average global temperature.
23 posted on
07/10/2010 3:10:52 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
So where was the Ellesmere Island on the map, 4 million years ago?
24 posted on
07/10/2010 3:23:51 PM PDT by
Deaf Smith
(Will trade tagline for beer (no diet beer))
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Let’s see, according to the warmists, if the temps rise, we’re doomed. They have evidence showing the planet was much warmer in the past than today. The planet, including humans, survived these much warmer temps. So why are we all doomed?
27 posted on
07/10/2010 4:02:29 PM PDT by
driftless2
(For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson