Skip to comments.
Researchers seeking the fourth property of electrons
Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres ^
| July 20, 2010
| Unknown
Posted on 07/20/2010 1:39:51 PM PDT by decimon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
1
posted on
07/20/2010 1:39:55 PM PDT
by
decimon
To: SunkenCiv
2
posted on
07/20/2010 1:40:57 PM PDT
by
decimon
To: decimon
You know, they say Property is nine tenths of the Law.
To: PetroniusMaximus
Ooops! That's Posession that's nine tenths!
Wrong thread!!!
To: PetroniusMaximus
You know, they say Property is nine tenths of the Law.Own the moment.
5
posted on
07/20/2010 1:52:02 PM PDT
by
decimon
To: decimon
You’ve got to pass the 2nd Chakra first, just ask Gore
To: decimon
Did somebody say FORE?
7
posted on
07/20/2010 1:54:33 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(The Last Boy Scout)
To: KingOfVagabonds
just ask GoreWhen he was just as small.
8
posted on
07/20/2010 1:54:58 PM PDT
by
decimon
To: decimon
monopole prospector ping.
9
posted on
07/20/2010 1:58:12 PM PDT
by
dangerdoc
To: decimon
You can make good money from helping research.
10
posted on
07/20/2010 1:58:30 PM PDT
by
Berlin_Freeper
(posted a total of 1,459 threads and 8,556 replies.)
To: decimon
Every other day, scientists discover some new facet of the Universe that makes them say, “this will change our ‘understanding of the Universe completely”.
One of these days, they might actually be right.
11
posted on
07/20/2010 1:59:26 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(The Last Boy Scout)
To: decimon
In the case of electrons, the situation is much more complicated because electrons should not actually have any spatial dimension.
This is where a layman goes "huh"?
Physicist: Well the electron is really really small so it doesn't have spatial dimensions.
Layman: Wouldn't it just have really really small spatial dimensions?
Physicist: No...because it is really really tiny.
Layman: If it's a physical object isn't it required to have spatial dimensions even if they are really really tiny...cuz otherwise it isn't really a physical object right?
Physicist: Uhm...(after a few moments and said condescendingly) You would understand if you were a physicist.
12
posted on
07/20/2010 2:12:49 PM PDT
by
Durus
(The People have abdicated our duties and anxiously hopes for just two things, "Bread and Circuses")
To: Durus
13
posted on
07/20/2010 2:19:20 PM PDT
by
decimon
To: decimon
14
posted on
07/20/2010 2:35:30 PM PDT
by
wally_bert
(It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
To: UCANSEE2
I think dipole spin is what got him into trouble...
To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
But who wouldn't want to study the electric dipole moment of the electron for it's own sake. ;') Thanks decimon, a two-list ping.
16
posted on
07/20/2010 3:11:26 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: decimon; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...
17
posted on
07/20/2010 3:17:28 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: SunkenCiv
At the risk of being suspended and/or banned, when the scientists die, they will ALL know the Truth of what has been speculated for centuries.
I, for one, prefer not to second-guess God when it comes to such minutely obscure data. :o])
18
posted on
07/20/2010 3:21:19 PM PDT
by
Monkey Face
(Welcome home to my awesome army grandson!! Prayers and yellow ribbons for Anoreth of CG fame!)
To: decimon
Up to now, nobody has successfully proven the existence of this assumed tiny dipole moment. I'd view Ralph Sansbury's experiment with electrostatic fields being generated by currents more or less as a proof of this, there's no other plausible explanation.
To: SunkenCiv
Apparently the other three properties were already being taxed, but the gubmint wants more.I blame Gurdjieff. It's the fourth way.
20
posted on
07/20/2010 3:23:09 PM PDT
by
decimon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson