1 posted on
07/20/2010 1:39:55 PM PDT by
decimon
To: SunkenCiv
2 posted on
07/20/2010 1:40:57 PM PDT by
decimon
To: decimon
You know, they say Property is nine tenths of the Law.
To: decimon
You’ve got to pass the 2nd Chakra first, just ask Gore
To: decimon
Did somebody say FORE?
7 posted on
07/20/2010 1:54:33 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(The Last Boy Scout)
To: decimon
monopole prospector ping.
9 posted on
07/20/2010 1:58:12 PM PDT by
dangerdoc
To: decimon
You can make good money from helping research.
10 posted on
07/20/2010 1:58:30 PM PDT by
Berlin_Freeper
(posted a total of 1,459 threads and 8,556 replies.)
To: decimon
Every other day, scientists discover some new facet of the Universe that makes them say, “this will change our ‘understanding of the Universe completely”.
One of these days, they might actually be right.
11 posted on
07/20/2010 1:59:26 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(The Last Boy Scout)
To: decimon
In the case of electrons, the situation is much more complicated because electrons should not actually have any spatial dimension.
This is where a layman goes "huh"?
Physicist: Well the electron is really really small so it doesn't have spatial dimensions.
Layman: Wouldn't it just have really really small spatial dimensions?
Physicist: No...because it is really really tiny.
Layman: If it's a physical object isn't it required to have spatial dimensions even if they are really really tiny...cuz otherwise it isn't really a physical object right?
Physicist: Uhm...(after a few moments and said condescendingly) You would understand if you were a physicist.
12 posted on
07/20/2010 2:12:49 PM PDT by
Durus
(The People have abdicated our duties and anxiously hopes for just two things, "Bread and Circuses")
To: decimon
14 posted on
07/20/2010 2:35:30 PM PDT by
wally_bert
(It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
But who wouldn't want to study the electric dipole moment of the electron for it's own sake. ;') Thanks decimon, a two-list ping.
16 posted on
07/20/2010 3:11:26 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: decimon; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...
17 posted on
07/20/2010 3:17:28 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: decimon
Up to now, nobody has successfully proven the existence of this assumed tiny dipole moment. I'd view Ralph Sansbury's experiment with electrostatic fields being generated by currents more or less as a proof of this, there's no other plausible explanation.
To: decimon
23 posted on
07/20/2010 3:33:50 PM PDT by
muir_redwoods
(Obama. Chauncey Gardiner without the homburg.)
To: decimon
So what are the first 3 properties? Mass, angular moment and charge?
To: decimon; SunkenCiv; E8crossE8
57 posted on
07/20/2010 11:23:33 PM PDT by
AdmSmith
(GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson