Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/20/2010 1:39:55 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Moment of four ping.


2 posted on 07/20/2010 1:40:57 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

You know, they say Property is nine tenths of the Law.


3 posted on 07/20/2010 1:45:00 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

You’ve got to pass the 2nd Chakra first, just ask Gore


6 posted on 07/20/2010 1:52:43 PM PDT by KingOfVagabonds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
Did somebody say FORE?


7 posted on 07/20/2010 1:54:33 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

monopole prospector ping.


9 posted on 07/20/2010 1:58:12 PM PDT by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

You can make good money from helping research.


10 posted on 07/20/2010 1:58:30 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (posted a total of 1,459 threads and 8,556 replies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

Every other day, scientists discover some new facet of the Universe that makes them say, “this will change our ‘understanding of the Universe completely”.

One of these days, they might actually be right.


11 posted on 07/20/2010 1:59:26 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
In the case of electrons, the situation is much more complicated because electrons should not actually have any spatial dimension.

This is where a layman goes "huh"?

Physicist: Well the electron is really really small so it doesn't have spatial dimensions.

Layman: Wouldn't it just have really really small spatial dimensions?

Physicist: No...because it is really really tiny.

Layman: If it's a physical object isn't it required to have spatial dimensions even if they are really really tiny...cuz otherwise it isn't really a physical object right?

Physicist: Uhm...(after a few moments and said condescendingly) You would understand if you were a physicist.


12 posted on 07/20/2010 2:12:49 PM PDT by Durus (The People have abdicated our duties and anxiously hopes for just two things, "Bread and Circuses")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhbqIJZ8wCM


14 posted on 07/20/2010 2:35:30 PM PDT by wally_bert (It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
But who wouldn't want to study the electric dipole moment of the electron for it's own sake. ;') Thanks decimon, a two-list ping.
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
 

16 posted on 07/20/2010 3:11:26 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...
Thanks decimon. Apparently the other three properties were already being taxed, but the gubmint wants more.

· List topics · post a topic · subscribe · Google ·

17 posted on 07/20/2010 3:17:28 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
Up to now, nobody has successfully proven the existence of this assumed tiny dipole moment.

I'd view Ralph Sansbury's experiment with electrostatic fields being generated by currents more or less as a proof of this, there's no other plausible explanation.

19 posted on 07/20/2010 3:23:09 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

ping


23 posted on 07/20/2010 3:33:50 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Obama. Chauncey Gardiner without the homburg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

So what are the first 3 properties? Mass, angular moment and charge?


28 posted on 07/20/2010 5:11:24 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon; SunkenCiv; E8crossE8
If it is found that the electron has a permanent electric dipole moment (.i.e. larger than 10−40 e·cm ) then the Standard Model has to be modified or replaced. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_electric_dipole_moment but a 90 % confidence level is not good enough

A technical powerpoint http://www.lns.cornell.edu/~journalc/public/talk/051129_Prasad.ppt
57 posted on 07/20/2010 11:23:33 PM PDT by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson