To: Christian Cage
In before the MO pictures.
2 posted on
08/04/2010 1:43:45 PM PDT by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: Christian Cage
To: Christian Cage
Didn’t get much beyond the first line. No, ALL America women do NOT want to wear a tiara!
5 posted on
08/04/2010 1:45:12 PM PDT by
basil
(It's time to rid the country of "Gun Free Zones" aka "Killing Fields")
To: Christian Cage
To: Christian Cage
9 posted on
08/04/2010 1:45:41 PM PDT by
WOBBLY BOB
(drain the swamp! ( then napalm it and pave it over ))
To: Christian Cage
Opulent, good.
Suet, bad.
12 posted on
08/04/2010 1:51:06 PM PDT by
Psalm 144
(We have, therefore, to resolve to conquer or die. - Samuel Adams)
To: Christian Cage
13 posted on
08/04/2010 1:51:06 PM PDT by
crosshairs
(Celebrate diversity. Own a variety of firearms.)
To: Christian Cage
I suppose that depends on how you define “plus” sized.
For some inexplicable reason, conventionally attractive has been defined as a size 0 to 2. The preference for extremely thin is actually relatively unique in history ... typically attractive is defined as curvy, not rail thin.
Personally, I prefer healthy curves ... if D-cups would send a woman toppling, she’s not built enough for my tastes.
SnakeDoc
14 posted on
08/04/2010 1:51:57 PM PDT by
SnakeDoctor
("Shut it down" ... 00:00:03 ... 00:00:02 ... 00:00:01 ... 00:00:00.)
To: Christian Cage
Well that adds too many syllables to the song. “Here she comes, Miss Plus Size America...” And what are the prizes? Tiara from Burger King and a 1 year supply of king size double whoppers with cheese?
Speaking of double whoppers, what if there was a tie?
15 posted on
08/04/2010 1:52:00 PM PDT by
TexasPatriot1
(Legalize the Constitution)
To: Christian Cage
Okay, at first I thought it read “As American Women Eaten...”
16 posted on
08/04/2010 1:52:33 PM PDT by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: Christian Cage
The definition of feminine “beauty” has changed several times, throughout history. Today's supermodels would not have been considered beautiful 60 years ago. A couple of hundred years ago, they'd be considered sickly.
As for the male perspective of female “beauty”; the one constant through the ages appears to be the waist-to-hip ratio. And, even that ratio varies by culture (lower in Asia, higher in Latin America).
To: Christian Cage
You guys can thank me later.
23 posted on
08/04/2010 2:00:21 PM PDT by
dfwgator
To: Christian Cage
I have the same problem with this as I do with ‘traditional’ beauty contests. Neither one promotes a healthy body image for girls/teenagers/young women.
To: Christian Cage
How about a “Who’s Ass Looks Most Like a Wet Bag of Popcorn” contest?
32 posted on
08/04/2010 2:05:44 PM PDT by
albie
To: Christian Cage
Coco, is she curvy enough?
36 posted on
08/04/2010 2:08:24 PM PDT by
Cardhu
To: Christian Cage
43 posted on
08/04/2010 2:12:38 PM PDT by
Iron Munro
(You can't kill the beast while sucking at its teat - Claire Wolfe)
To: Christian Cage
Uh-oh Here comes Beefalo...
54 posted on
08/04/2010 2:34:14 PM PDT by
frithguild
(Joe Wilson was wrong when he shouted "You lie!" Obama doesn't just lie - he lies all the time.)
To: Christian Cage
62 posted on
08/04/2010 3:02:12 PM PDT by
wyowolf
("we were the winners , cause we didn't know we could fail.")
To: Christian Cage
Perhaps, but they are opening in South America! Keep right on sending your hotties, amigos. My boy is about that age now...;)
63 posted on
08/04/2010 3:04:35 PM PDT by
Caipirabob
( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Christian Cage
Yeeeetch!
Cage - you owe me a new cup of coffee! The thought of “Porkers On Parade” ruined my cup of coffee.
;-)
67 posted on
08/04/2010 3:54:39 PM PDT by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
