Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Madison Five 911 caller told police “there’s no problem”(WI)
DC Gun Rights Examiner ^ | 24 September, 2010 | Mike Stollenwerk

Posted on 09/24/2010 5:06:00 AM PDT by marktwain

Last Saturday the Madison, WI police department responded to a 911 call about five men openly carrying holstered handguns near a Culver’s restaurant. Police soon arrived, detained the men, now referred to by some as “the Madison Five,” and demanded they produce identity credentials.

The police ultimately cuffed, searched, and charged two men who refused to provide ID with “obstruction of justice.” Days later “Madison Police North District Capt. Cameron McLay said he believes officers acted appropriately in responding to . . . the [911] caller's concern that something might happen.”

However the 911 call recording obtained by the Examiner.com pursuant to an Open Records Act request from Dane County does not support Capt. McLay’s characterization. The caller, Ms. Phyllis Micke, emphasized to the 911 dispatcher that the guns were in holsters, and that “there’s no problem” . . . [the men are] “just sitting there extremely relaxed.”

After the dispatcher explained that open carry was legal unless they are threatening or disturbing people, Micke declared that

“there’s no problem and it’s no emergency . . .I feel bad then, if they’re not doing anything wrong then it’s my mistake.”

Wisconsin Carry Inc. (WCO) President Nik Clark is not surprised by the tenor of the 911 call. Clark said that “every time somebody has called the police about open carriers it has essentially been to ask if open carry was legal, not to report a disturbance.”


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: banglist; madison; opencarry; wi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: TexasFreeper2009

I would sue them for millions and then say if you fire all of the officers involved including the chief I will let you off for only a $100,000.


21 posted on 09/24/2010 6:11:03 AM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

“What I have a problem with, with the audio, is the name, phone number and address of the caller not being edited out.”

I understand your concern, but it is a public record. On an event that is gaining national attention, it will get out.


22 posted on 09/24/2010 6:11:07 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

also found this on a local forum. Still not sure on how much truth there is to it but if it is this chick is focked

“A member of the Wisconsin Carry sent an email to a member of Madison city council and this was her response.”

“Have a good time staying at home. While legal, it’s inappropriate and
aggressive to pack your little pistols in public places. We won’t miss
you or the childish displays of constitutional freedoms.

Lauren Cnare”


23 posted on 09/24/2010 6:21:05 AM PDT by acw011 (Great Goooogly Mooogly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Why would anyone want to own Madison, WI?


24 posted on 09/24/2010 6:22:40 AM PDT by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Did they get them on Sect 242? Or Official misconduct?


25 posted on 09/24/2010 6:28:56 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Alarm and Muster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

DO NOT EVER call 911 to ask a question.

911 will always trigger an armed response and in most cases must result in an arrest, as in domestic disturbance.

So who do you call. We are so conditioned to use 911 that nobody has a clue of any other number to call.

There are many times that cell phone calls to 911 can not even get an live person on the phone, only an automated GPS directed police action (to the geographic coordinates the cell towers triangulate).

Unless someone’s life is in immediate and imminent danger, avoid 911.


26 posted on 09/24/2010 6:30:39 AM PDT by George from New England (Escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: acw011

heeeeere’s Lauren!

Hey lookie: apparently her home address and phone number are a matter of public record. http://www.cityofmadison.com/council/district03/


27 posted on 09/24/2010 6:31:23 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ripley
[...] why did this individual take it upon himself to call [...]

Who? Is there someone beside Phyllis?

28 posted on 09/24/2010 6:34:13 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ratman83; Dead Corpse; Lurker; marktwain
I would sue them for millions and then say if you fire charge all of the officers involved including the chief under USC 18 and RICO, as well as a pile of local/state charges in a manner that po-po will always do to citizens, THEN I will let you off for only a $100,000...

this is really what MUST be done to stem the tide of these public *servants*...

29 posted on 09/24/2010 6:38:59 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

It’s not unusual for further information to completely change the situation. I said it might in the earlier threads, so this is not unexpected.

I already said we had probably exhausted the subject unless new info came out.


30 posted on 09/24/2010 6:40:26 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

The most disturbing part starts at 3:47.


31 posted on 09/24/2010 6:42:45 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

So yet another case of cop thugary...cops probably less qualified to carry arms than the men they are harassing...I say it again, we need fewer cops and more armed citizens.


32 posted on 09/24/2010 6:42:56 AM PDT by Magnum44 (Terrorism is a disease, precise application of superior firepower is the cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68

I have no problem with being wrong.

Unsurprisingly, it’s happened before, and no doubt it will happen again.

I do not understand the juvenile celebrations of the possibility, though.

Are we all back in high school or what?


33 posted on 09/24/2010 6:44:16 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gilbo_3

Yeah I like that, the officers must be held acountable, not the taxpayers.


34 posted on 09/24/2010 6:45:34 AM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
The Madison 5 should own the city after this.

The problem is, the politicians who direct the police response get off Scot-free while the taxpayer gets punished.

35 posted on 09/24/2010 6:46:22 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

There is a problem anytime the police are involved now.

At one time long ago, the police were the law abiding citizen’s friend. This is no longer the case in most places. There are some exceptions.

Now the police consider everyone they come in contact with as either criminals or potential criminals. i.e. Those that have committed a crime or those that might commit a crime in the future.


36 posted on 09/24/2010 6:47:34 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

“heeeeere’s Lauren!”

Working to find proof of that response - it could have been any dumb hard core progressive response that are popping up all over Madison News boards and someone appended her name to it..

Although - I guess we could follow the SeeB.S. investigative tactic and just say,it’s not the accuracy of the evidence it’s the seriousness of the allegation...

I’ll post up if I can verify.


37 posted on 09/24/2010 6:49:23 AM PDT by acw011 (Great Goooogly Mooogly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
It’s not unusual for further information to completely change the situation.

This was pointed out yesterday. You tried to argue around it. I understand the desire to not want to make a snap judgment, but this one is pretty blatant on the departments side.

This has been an ongoing issue and as I'm in a neighboring State, I have an interest in what happens there.

38 posted on 09/24/2010 6:53:53 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Alarm and Muster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Police soon arrived...and demanded they produce identity credentials.

I guess it's safe to say that these men were not Hispanic. Otherwise asking for ID would have been a civil rights violation.

39 posted on 09/24/2010 7:00:24 AM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
What was truly juvenile was your complete lack of logical understanding about the situation. Even after some posters gave you a fairly easy out, you doubled down on the side of controlling authority and the notion that one paranoid, ignorant citizen is more important than another individuals rights.
40 posted on 09/24/2010 7:01:09 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (I believe in man-made political climate change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson